Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2009, 10:59 PM   #1
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default Motortrend Camaro SS vs. Challenger R/T vs. Mustang GT

Link to article

Finish Lines

Going into this test, and knowing the basic stats, we had an inkling how it might turn out. (All three cars, by the way, eke out impressive and nearly identical fuel-economy results -- though the Mustang's lack of a six-speed means it finishes last on EPA.) Never did we guess, though, how close the overall finish would turn out to be.

In third place, the Dodge Challenger R/T. Third of three, but hardly last. As MacKenzie well sums up: "Hugely endearing personality. Even though the Challenger starts to fall apart dynamically above 7/10ths you can't help but like the big guy. It's sorta like a Heritage Soft-Tail Harley; a carefully crafted and easy to own reminder of a simpler, sunnier America." Astutely executed, fast, and sit-back comfortable, the Challenger is the pony you'd ride for a 50-state tour. On the downside, the orange bruiser simply can't carve with the precision of its rivals, and though it starts with a mid-pack base sticker ($30,945), adding the good stuff (six-speed manual, 3.92 rear axle, limited-slip diff, 20-in. wheels and tires, etc.) pushed the price of our tester to a trio-topping $38,270.

Finishing in second place . . . the Ford Mustang GT. Mind you, this was a photo-finish. The Mustang with Track Pack blew us all away with its sublime steering, incredible front-end grip, stylish cockpit, and beauteous V-8. As Loh notes, "That's what most impressed me: Ford's two competitors had the advantage of sampling 45 years of Mustang DNA, yet they still couldn't pull out a runaway win." The Mustang scores well on value, too: base price for the GT is $28,845, and with Premium package, Track Pack, security package, and the comfort group, our test car totaled $34,330. The Ford might even have scored an upset, except it cannot match the Camaro's unfailing poise, its breathtaking power, or its styling drama. Those quality issues sure didn't help, either.

And so . . . our winner, the Prime Pony of the 21st Century is . . . the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS. Considering all the ways GM could easily have got this car wrong, it's nothing short of a triumph how unquestionably the company got it right. The Camaro might trail the Mustang in handling sharpness, and there's no doubt it finishes last for cabin and trunk volume, but, well, you don't pick your pony for the size of its saddlebags. Graced with massive power, excellent efficiency, unfailing refinement, and show-stopping looks, the Camaro SS nails every essential for its segment. What's more, it's priced to steal. Base sticker for the 1SS manual: just $30,995. With the Boston Acoustics audio package, our cloth-seat tester climbed only to $31,490. Go nuts with the options pencil -- adding leather, power sunroof, ground effects, six-speed auto, and more stuff you really don't need -- and you can nudge the SS just over $40K.

So there you have it: Chevrolet claims the ponycar title, circa 2009. Now, go to it, Hatfields, McCoys, and HatCoys. We've been waiting 35 years to witness once again perhaps the all-time greatest feud in Autoland. Where's my cigar? Ah, there's the opening bell!

Last edited by SeanPlunk : 03-24-2009 at 11:20 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 11:04 PM   #2
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

A link to the numbers.

And some pictures:






Last edited by SeanPlunk : 03-24-2009 at 10:22 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 11:41 PM   #3
SoCalC55SoCalC55 is offline
Senior Member
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 540
Default

Still cant wait to pull up next to a SS at a light =)
__________________
2006 C55 AMG
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 09:25 AM   #4
SexyLxySexyLxy is offline
Senior Member
 
SexyLxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 448
Send a message via AIM to SexyLxy
Default

I'm still a challanger girl. It's the best representation of a current model that looks closest to its roots. (even though it's a FAT PIG!...I still love it).
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 10:10 AM   #5
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

I have nothing to say.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 10:12 AM   #6
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalC55 View Post
Still cant wait to pull up next to a SS at a light =)
With a good driver, it should take you. A car pulling 111mph traps is no joke
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:27 PM   #7
LeedomLeedom is offline
Graphics B*tch
 
Leedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
With a good driver, it should take you. A car pulling 111mph traps is no joke
So Sean what Sean is trying to say is that if he (SeanPlunk) were driving it you could take it otherwise no you could not.
__________________
Adam

'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)

'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')

'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:01 PM   #8
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default








  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:13 PM   #9
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leedom View Post
So Sean what Sean is trying to say is that if he (SeanPlunk) were driving it you could take it otherwise no you could not.
Judging by the 1/4 times you've run so far, the new Camaro in your hands would also be a 13.5+sec car
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:50 PM   #10
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

So gentleman, if you were buying tomorrow what's your order? For me it would be:

1) Camaro
2) Challenger
3) Mustang

Now, if the Mustang really gets the 400hp 5.0 DOHC engine next year then it moves to the top of the list
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM.