Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-12-2008, 09:42 PM   #1
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default Cylinder Deactivation?

I'm trying to think of a reason that would prevent me from setting up my own cylinder deactivation mode with a switch.

To me it seems that all you would need to do would be to setup a switch that would cut spark at the spark plug wires and cut the electricity to the fuel injectors. You'd have to think about which cylinders to cut to keep the engine balanced but that would be easy.

Am I missing something here? The only problem that I could see with this is that it might trip the 02 sensor out, half of the cylinders would be pumping atmosphere out the exhaust. But that's the only problem I could see with this. It wouldn't trip the knock sensors out... Am I crazy?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 10:31 PM   #2
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Yeah, I don't think you'll notice the difference between 8mpg and 6mpg that much
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:15 PM   #3
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

I get 20+ on the highway wise guy.

And I'm talking about the Neon. Wouldn't work with the Vette, the carb dumps fuel at the top of the manifold, so there is no way to regulate it between cylinders. But the Neon injects the fuel into the manifold right above the cylinder.

Now that I think about it, there might not even be a need to cut spark. If there is little to no fuel in the chamber it wouldn't matter... I think? Might be as simple as hooking up two of the fuel injectors to a switch.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:27 PM   #4
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Let me get this straight, you want to cut your 4 cylinder down to a 2 cylinder? What the hell is wrong with you? Just go buy a Vespa or a Segway if you care so much about gas mileage
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:27 PM   #5
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

P.S. I strongly endorse your project, PLEASE, PLEASE take pictures - I can't wait to see the results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:59 PM   #6
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
Let me get this straight, you want to cut your 4 cylinder down to a 2 cylinder? What the hell is wrong with you? Just go buy a Vespa or a Segway if you care so much about gas mileage
Yesss. It doesn't take 150 hp to keep my lil 2500 pounder at a constant speed on the highway.

Take pics of what? Splicing a wire? I'm really not even sure that this would work, but someone's done it before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:30 AM   #7
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
Yesss. It doesn't take 150 hp to keep my lil 2500 pounder at a constant speed on the highway.

Take pics of what? Splicing a wire? I'm really not even sure that this would work, but someone's done it before.
You aren't making anywhere near 150 BHP at a constant speed on the freeway, unless it's at peak HP somewhere in the vicinity of Red Line. Try more like 40 (or less). Reduce by two cylinders and you'll be making well less than half of that, probably not enough to maintain freeway speed. Remember, your remaining two cylinders (4 stroke cycle) not only have to do enough work over time (power) to maintain a constant speed against drag, etc., but have to compress the two deactivated cylinders and spin the whole rotating assembly. My guess is that if it worked at all, you'd be finding yourself at higher revs to make similar power and not save any fuel, while increasing wear on the engine. This is my hypothesis. Please test and report.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 09:44 AM   #8
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
You aren't making anywhere near 150 BHP at a constant speed on the freeway, unless it's at peak HP somewhere in the vicinity of Red Line. Try more like 40 (or less). Reduce by two cylinders and you'll be making well less than half of that, probably not enough to maintain freeway speed. Remember, your remaining two cylinders (4 stroke cycle) not only have to do enough work over time (power) to maintain a constant speed against drag, etc., but have to compress the two deactivated cylinders and spin the whole rotating assembly. My guess is that if it worked at all, you'd be finding yourself at higher revs to make similar power and not save any fuel, while increasing wear on the engine. This is my hypothesis. Please test and report.
The engine spins at 4K rpm at 80mph, the speed at which I typically cruise on the freeway. You really think my engine is only making 40hp at 4K rpm?

The best thing to do would be to get a custom 5th gear made to put me around 2500rpm at 80mph. But that would be a PITA and I'm not even sure how I'd go about it.

But the reason I posted this thread, I was looking for flaws in the actual mechanics of my plan. Would this work? Am I missing something? Would it in fact trip the 02 sensor out? What do you guys think?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 12:07 PM   #9
Sonic03SVTSonic03SVT is offline
Senior Member
 
Sonic03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Default

The computer would absolutely lose its mind. It would be registering insufficient fuel flow, failing injectors, a massively lean condition, as well as an ignition fault. If youre lucky, youd end up with a check engine light. If unlucky, "limp" mode and horrible mileage. Also, your 02s measure lean, and the computer will add fuel...meaning your remaining 2 cylinders would run really rich, besides that, youd have to alternate cylinders, as without fuel going into the remaining two cylinders i think youd find theyd get REALLY hot REALLY fast, fuel really being the only thing that cools them. You may lose valve seats or scuff cylinders. Intriguing idea though, itd be neat to see if it could be made to work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 11:49 AM   #10
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Failing injectors is something that did slip my mind, can't think of a way to get by that. And I figured I could fix the 'massively lean condition' or O2 sensor problem with a resistor. But I guess it's not happening now.

Out of curiosity though, about the fuel keeping the piston cool, I wouldn't think that it would be a problem. Without the combustion happening I would think that the oil and coolant would be enough to keep the piston cool, wouldn't you? I mean, it seems to work for Dodge.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:08 AM.