Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2014, 05:43 AM   #11
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

Again, updated ring model.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2014, 12:43 PM   #12
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BADDASSC6 View Post
Again, updated ring model.
I stand to be corrected, but I believe you are mistaken.

The Ring package specs were announced in March 2010 and were not publicly tested until June 2011, when it ran the 7:14.

The tests quoted above, where it ran a 7:38 on street tires on the longer course, the same as the ZR1 and F458 on PS2s with the same driver were from September 2010 . . . with a press car.

The time from the TG track, where it had the fastest wet lap ever (about the same as a ZO6 in the dry AIR BTW) was in January, before the Ring package was even announced.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 08:36 PM   #13
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

That motor sounds good. 650hp for a n/a 4.9L motor from the factory on only 10:1cr is pretty stout.
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 05:46 AM   #14
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

The motor only made 550 hp @8700 rpm and 354 ft lbm. Pretty much identical to a Gallardo for double the price. Ben, in the local reviews it struggled against a GTR and a Zo6. I'm not impressed. It would have been fine if it cost $120k not $375k. Most manufacturers will that do R&d at the ring release ring times before the model is available.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 11:55 AM   #15
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BADDASSC6 View Post
The motor only made 550 hp @8700 rpm and 354 ft lbm. Pretty much identical to a Gallardo for double the price. Ben, in the local reviews it struggled against a GTR and a Zo6. I'm not impressed. It would have been fine if it cost $120k not $375k. Most manufacturers will that do R&d at the ring release ring times before the model is available.
THE QUOTED TIMES WERE FROM EURO MAGAZINES DOING HEAD TO HEAD COMPAROS NOT THE MANUFACTURER. IT WAS A PRESS CAR.

Nothing that I can see indicates that car was the Ring model, all lists show standard edition (and other cars as their specific models, e.g., Scuderia, Italia, etc.). It was in September 2010, the Manufacturer Ring model numbers are from 2011.

AFIK, they easily sold all units. So the price is completely irrelevant to people in that market. WTF do they care. They're not middle class.

It was an R&D test bed and a Halo car. Lexus got what they wanted out of the car. The fact there are other cars as fast or faster for the same or less money doesn't mean much of anything where it matters. The Market > Forums.

I understand you're not impressed. Ok.

If you're looking for an impressive bit of engineering at an affordable middle class price (sort of) that's fast with basically any driver, one answer stands out by a mile, the GT-R.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 08:26 AM   #16
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BADDASSC6 View Post
7:14 was the LFA Ring model too not the original car. The original car was much slower. Again too little too late. The car was so anticipated and hyped as a world beater and didn't do shit.
Youre such a hater. We should sneak over to your place, have Guy tow away your Corvette, and trade it in for a BRZ. I think your head would explode.
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 08:29 AM   #17
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
THE QUOTED TIMES WERE FROM EURO MAGAZINES DOING HEAD TO HEAD COMPAROS NOT THE MANUFACTURER. IT WAS A PRESS CAR.

Nothing that I can see indicates that car was the Ring model, all lists show standard edition (and other cars as their specific models, e.g., Scuderia, Italia, etc.). It was in September 2010, the Manufacturer Ring model numbers are from 2011.

AFIK, they easily sold all units. So the price is completely irrelevant to people in that market. WTF do they care. They're not middle class.

It was an R&D test bed and a Halo car. Lexus got what they wanted out of the car. The fact there are other cars as fast or faster for the same or less money doesn't mean much of anything where it matters. The Market > Forums.

I understand you're not impressed. Ok.

If you're looking for an impressive bit of engineering at an affordable middle class price (sort of) that's fast with basically any driver, one answer stands out by a mile, the GT-R.
Not everything is speed. Or Jay Leno's garage would just be full of Ferraris.

Id take a 97 Viper over a C6, even though the C6 is probably a better track car. Speed + Sound + Sex Appeal = Desirable Sports Car
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 02:37 PM   #18
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
Not everything is speed. Or Jay Leno's garage would just be full of Ferraris.

Id take a 97 Viper over a C6, even though the C6 is probably a better track car. Speed + Sound + Sex Appeal = Desirable Sports Car
Carlos is basically an engineer. Those are highly deprecated parameters to him.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 10:26 PM   #19
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

Enkie,
Yup I'm a hater. Whats new. Yup, you would pick a Viper over a C6. I literally shopped for both when I bought my Corvette. I went with the C6 because it was just as fast and operating cost were much less. I'm sure you would take the viper because for some guys looking cool is enough. Not me. I like to compete.
CNJ
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 03:03 PM   #20
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

If it's merely track speed : cost calculation, wouldn't something like a Caterham Seven 480 be an even better choice?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:13 PM.