Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-16-2009, 09:10 PM   #11
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Were they all low before or just the ones that were broken? If they were all low before I don't see how they won't be now. Are you sure you have as high of a compression ratio as you thought? What type of pistons do you have, flat top or dished? If dish what's the cc? How thick of a head gasket are you using? What the deck height on the pistons?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:22 PM   #12
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

I've done the math before obviously, but feel free to double check.

Standard deck height which is 20 or 25 down, -5cc reliefs, 74cc heads, 61 HG, 4.03 bore...

I get about 9:1, with a 110LSA I guess I shouldn't expect much dynamic.
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:05 AM   #13
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
Got my new piston pressed today. In the process of removing the old rings, and I've snapped several. Is there a trick to installing the new ones without snapping them?

Also, setting the gap at .022, did the Total Seal math and I get .022165 for a blown gas engine.

Old rings were not installed upside down.
I've been doing the ring install by finger and thumb since the 70s. I'd have to show you how it's done. I don't think I could explain in words.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:22 AM   #14
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
I've done the math before obviously, but feel free to double check.

Standard deck height which is 20 or 25 down, -5cc reliefs, 74cc heads, 61 HG, 4.03 bore...

I get about 9:1, with a 110LSA I guess I shouldn't expect much dynamic.
Just ran your numbers thru the engine program I have. I got 8.49 ratio.

I did it three times.


I used the same program on my engine.

I ran that for a 350.

For a 383 it is 9.17
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:41 AM   #15
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
I've done the math before obviously, but feel free to double check.

Standard deck height which is 20 or 25 down, -5cc reliefs, 74cc heads, 61 HG, 4.03 bore...

I get about 9:1, with a 110LSA I guess I shouldn't expect much dynamic.
What's the bore on the head gasket?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:42 AM   #16
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
What's the bore on the head gasket?
I used 4.060 bore for the head gasket.


With a 4.030 hg bore the cr is 8.50.

Again, that is for a 350.


383 with 4.060 hg bore is 9.17
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:46 AM   #17
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
I used 4.60 bore for the head gasket.
He has a 383 with a 3.75 stroke, correct?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:49 AM   #18
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
He has a 383 with a 3.75 stroke, correct?
Shit that is right. Ok, I'll redo it.

383 is 9.17
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 01:10 PM   #19
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

Knew I forgot something, 4.166 bore HG, 3.75 stroke. 6" rod if that matters.
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 01:34 PM   #20
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
Knew I forgot something, 4.166 bore HG, 3.75 stroke. 6" rod if that matters.
I got 9.12 cr.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 PM.