|
|
|
07-21-2010, 08:22 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 248
|
RB26DETT Ftw
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 09:25 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
|
meh, RB is heavier than an LS, more complicated, and more expensive, both to get and to mod. Now, an aluminum block 302 based stroker with a g-force/astro performance T-5 is actually lighter than an LS/t56 combo, and would probably be my choice, but you cant exactly go wrong with either one.
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 09:35 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic03SVT
meh, RB is heavier than an LS, more complicated, and more expensive, both to get and to mod. Now, an aluminum block 302 based stroker with a g-force/astro performance T-5 is actually lighter than an LS/t56 combo, and would probably be my choice, but you cant exactly go wrong with either one.
|
Very true. I have no problems a 302 with a t-5. Especially when it'll spin high rpms, and put out a good amount of power N/A. You can even pull a good budget build and go with a good GT-40 setup from an explorer. With all the bolt-ons and supporting mods you'll have a good runner.
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 12:21 PM
|
#14
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic03SVT
LS is a bit heavier than the SR ( about 50 pounds, from what i could gather, once you factor in the weights of the turbo set up for the sr and their respective transmissions ) as far as the durability of the silvia rear end dont know, nobody keeps it :P all the swaps ive seen have ford 9 inch rears.
|
From what I've been able to gather a fully dressed SR20DET with trans is about 450 and full LS/T56 is about 550. So about 100pounds, not a huge a difference. But just eyeballing it, it looks like a fair bit of that weight with an LS will be hanging over the front axle unless you really cut up the firewall and push it back into the cab.
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 05:29 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
|
most ls swaps i see have about a 3-4 inch rearward shift of the firewall to move the engine back. Not to make it fit, but to even out the weight.
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 09:40 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
We did think about the Rotary (turbo from an FD) since it can be packaged just about anywhere. The LS7 is likely too big and certainly too expensive. The RB25, like the 2JZ are fantastic, but probably too long as I6s. Mmmmm.
Of course sometimes, the obvious is obvious for a reason. Full SR20DETs with trans and harness go around $2,500 +- and they can make awesome reliable power, it's just that everyone does that for a 510.
|
I may know of a 1980-81 RX-7 with a Wankel... My Uncle bought it new and sold it to this guy a few years ago after having it in storage for 10+ years...
The current owner backed into something and hasn't driven it since... (Newport beach). He said something like $1,000.00....
Just throwing it out there for anybody
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 01:42 AM
|
#17
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic03SVT
most ls swaps i see have about a 3-4 inch rearward shift of the firewall to move the engine back. Not to make it fit, but to even out the weight.
|
Mmm, may have to seriously consider it, though honestly I'm not sure that much power is really necessary and perusing super lightness might be a better challenge. Maybe a modern HO V6 would be worth taking a peak at. Then again hearing an LS from a 510 would be pretty cool.
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 10:58 AM
|
#18
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
|
Vq37vhr
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 12:55 PM
|
#19
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette
Vq37vhr
|
Not a big fan of the sound of a VQ motor, but it's a possibility too. They're expensive to mod beyond the stock form.
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 02:54 PM
|
#20
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
|
The 35 might be better for mods. Depends if he wants to be happy with 330hp, or if he wants to mod a 270hp motor to the 4-500 range.
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|