Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2010, 10:03 PM   #21
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by joedls View Post
While probably the better looking of the GT 350s, the 67 is not even close to the performance of the 65-66. The longer they produced this car the more "gentrified" it became.
I knew it was reduced over those years, but I didn't think it was neutered or anything like that. Details?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 10:39 PM   #22
joedlsjoedls is offline
Senior Member
 
joedls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 739
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
I knew it was reduced over those years, but I didn't think it was neutered or anything like that. Details?
The 67 gained almost 500 lbs, had softer suspension, the scoops used to cool the brakes were just cosmetic, and it had an optional automatic transmission. You could get a supercharged version, however.

The 68 didn't even have a high performance engine any longer. Just a 4-barrel 302.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

HP numbers are good and all, but they are like asking someone how much they can bench. What difference does it make if I can still kick your ass?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 12:01 AM   #23
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by joedls View Post
The 67 gained almost 500 lbs, had softer suspension, the scoops used to cool the brakes were just cosmetic, and it had an optional automatic transmission. You could get a supercharged version, however.

The 68 didn't even have a high performance engine any longer. Just a 4-barrel 302.
Wow! I did know it got that de-balled that fast.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 12:41 AM   #24
Sonic03SVTSonic03SVT is offline
Senior Member
 
Sonic03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Default
65 GT350 would still be my all time favorite. A legit road-going race car. Solid lifters and no back seat.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top