Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-24-2012, 07:49 AM   #1
RSS ReaderRSS Reader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 93,142
Default Meet the LT1: The Corvette C7's new 6.2-liter small block V8



Chevrolet is making huge news today, revealing most all of the details about its new Gen 5 Small Block V8 engine - dubbed LT1 - the very mill that will power the upcoming 2014 Chevy Corvette. Note that we'll be updating this post all morning as the information keeps streaming in, so check back often.
Preliminary numbers suggest no less than 450 horsepower and 450 pound-feet of torque.
The Corvette's new LT1 V8 engine is, no surprise here, set to make the car very competitive within its class. Preliminary numbers suggest no less than 450 horsepower and 450 pound-feet of torque for the 6.2-liter engine, as well as an estimated 0-60 mile per hour time of less than 4.0 seconds. To put those numbers in perspective a bit: The LT1 not only has a far higher specific output than the 6.2-liter LS3 that it replaces - up at least 20 hp and 26 lb-ft - but its torque is seemingly competitive with that of the 7.0-liter LS7 that lives in the heart of the current Corvette Z06.

With all that power and accelerative performance, Chevy engineers are still keeping fuel economy in mind - with the help of cylinder deactivation, the new Corvette powerplant is expected to deliver more than 26 miles per gallon on the highway, though figures for city driving are still unknown. The new small block also benefits from the latest advanced engine tech like direct injection, continuously variable valve technology and a relatively high 11.5:1 compression ratio, all while coming in a claimed 40-pounds lighter and four inches shorter than the 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 by BMW.

GM is calling the LT1 its most advanced combustion system ever. The company analyzed literally hundreds of systems to get to this final product, including crunching over 6 million hours of CPU time dedicated to combustion system optimization, and nearly 10 million hours when combustion, structure, cooling systems, lubrication and vent systems are factored in. In fact, the motor and its systems are so advanced that an academic SAE paper is being written to explain the whole shebang. The engine will also be built at the company's 75-year-old Tonawanda plant, which happens to be where Chevy's original small block V8 was produced way back in 1955.Meet the LT1: The Corvette C7's new 6.2-liter small block V8 originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.


Permalink | Email this | Comments

More...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 11:02 AM   #2
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

Very sexy. Is should make some very good power too. I really cant wait till the aftermarket get some superchargers for this thing.


Also it looks like we should beable to swap to the new heads on the older motors to get DI
__________________
2006 CTS-V
1993 Trooper
1991 Impulse RS
1988 Trooper II SAS
1986 TrooperII (No Rear)
1988 Impulse (dead)
1983 K20
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 04:16 PM   #3
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Pretty impressive. I wonder how much is involved in going DI in total though. It's gotta be a rather completely different fuel system (pump, rails, injectors I would guess) and I wonder if the older harnesses plug to the newer injectors.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 05:14 PM   #4
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Why would they call it the LT1? They already have an LT1. If they wanted to go with LT it should have been the LT2.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 05:33 PM   #5
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
Why would they call it the LT1? They already have an LT1. If they wanted to go with LT it should have been the LT2.
TO be fair they also had LS's before the current gen 3 and gen 4 motors

Old ls6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrol...ock_engine#454

I agree that Dont like the name too much an LX1 or LC1 would be better IMHO
__________________
2006 CTS-V
1993 Trooper
1991 Impulse RS
1988 Trooper II SAS
1986 TrooperII (No Rear)
1988 Impulse (dead)
1983 K20
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 05:46 PM   #6
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

GM has reused motor names a bunch of times. This is not the second, but the third(!) LT1.
1970-1972
1992-1997
2014-?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:08 PM.