|
|
 |
|
09-07-2009, 12:08 PM
|
#1
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Best American Sedan Ever?
I submit as my nomination the current Cadillac CTS-V.
556hp
551ft/lb
RWD
Really good Manual and Automatic Transmissions
Great Looking (although I prefer the looks of the base model to the V), nice interior and by all accounts fantastic to drive.
What do you guys think? Agree, or disagree?
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 04:53 PM
|
#2
|
|
Graphics B*tch
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
|
I can not disagree on this one. I like a lot of what Cadillac is doing. Not just grandpa's car anymore.
__________________
Adam
'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)
'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')
'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 08:59 PM
|
#3
|
|
Fast & Filthy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
|
The CTS-V is a nice car but I have to go with the 2010 SHO.
 |
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 09:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396
The CTS-V is a nice car but I have to go with the 2010 SHO.
|
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 10:47 PM
|
#5
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
I love the SHO, but for that money (under 45k) I think I'd rather have a Pontiac G8 GXP.
LS3, 415hp, and it weighs in at 3969 (300lbs less than the SHO).
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 10:51 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,509
|
CTS-V for me. I bet they didnt spend near as much time/money developing the suspension in the SHO as they did in the CTS-V.
__________________
93 GMC Typhoon: new money pit/PITA. Now GT3788R powered.
Boost, because sometimes atmospheric pressure just isn't enough.
"If it has tit's or tires, you can be pretty sure your going to have problems with them..."
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 11:32 PM
|
#7
|
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian
CTS-V for me. I bet they didnt spend near as much time/money developing the suspension in the SHO as they did in the CTS-V.
|
Ford fixed their own problems, spends their own money, and honors its commitments to their investors and debt holders. I'd buy a new Ford, you couldn't give me a new GM product, even if it is as awesome as the CTS-V.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 11:43 PM
|
#8
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Ford fixed their own problems, spends their own money, and honors its commitments to their investors and debt holders. I'd buy a new Ford, you couldn't give me a new GM product, even if it is as awesome as the CTS-V.
|
While true, we're judging these cars on an objective level. Having said that I'd go:
1) CTS-V
2) G8 GXP
3) SHO
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 11:50 PM
|
#9
|
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk
While true, we're judging these cars on an objective level. Having said that I'd go:
1) CTS-V
2) G8 GXP
3) SHO
|
Setting aside my vitriolic contempt for GM, I'd agree. (Part of the reason they piss me off so much.)
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 11:53 PM
|
#10
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Setting aside my vitriolic contempt for GM, I'd agree. (Part of the reason they piss me off so much.)
|
I understand how you feel. I'm hoping that GM will make good someday so that I can have a used C6 Z06
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
