[enkeivette]

Engine: Ford 250 cid L6:
+Block: bored and honed 0.030” over decked to 9.440”
+Pistons: Ross Racing Forged Al 8.7:1 Compression, Spiro-Locks, Full Floating Pins
+Crank: Turned 0.010 & 0.010 and Cryogenically Strengthened, Machined rear snout and rear main cap to accept 1 piece rear main seal from ’89 mustang 5.0.
+Rods: 6 inch C-c Cunningham 2 piece forged I-beam Bronze bushed for full floating Chevy pins
+Comp Cams: Dur @ 0.050
-Int:224° Exh:218° LSA: 115°
-Gross valve Lift:
-Int:0.494 Exh:0.447
+CI Al Head & Cast Al Intake:
-street / strip porting option 1.56” Exh Valve
-Viton seals
-64cc chamber
+Transmission: Ford Racing T-5 and associated Mcleod Industries Clutchery
+Rear end: 3.70:1 Detroit Tru-trac worm gear posi, 31 spline axles,
+Tires: 245/45/ZR17

[Vettezuki]

Is it done?

[enkeivette]

Nope, just added more pics. He wants to get it running NA with a carb just to test everything out. Turbo and FI are still in his garage

[enkeivette]

Oops, looks like I didnt get a shot of the trans. I think its a built T5 with a hurst shifter and a mc cleod clutch

[94cobra69ss396]

Is that a 200ci Ford I6? What's done to the engine?

[enkeivette]

Car came with a 200, this is a 250 with coated pistons, chevy rods, an australian aftermarket aluminum cylinder head and intake manifold, turbo cut cam, custom dampener, and its setup for an HEI.

I dont know the specifics really Ill get more info, but he has a ton of money into the engine, FI and turbo. He spares no expense with this car as you can tell from looking underneath it.

[Vettezuki]

A+ for what huh.

[enkeivette]

Originally Posted by Vettezuki

A+ for what huh.

...?

[enkeivette]

If you think about it, aside from the fact that a 289 would have been cheaper, 39 cubic inches is significant but not a huge difference. And Id take a turbo 250 over a 289 any day.

[Shaolin Crane]

Originally Posted by enkeivette

...And Id take a turbo 250 over a 289 any day.

Why?