Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2010, 02:34 PM   #11
BRIANBRIAN is offline
Senior Member
 
BRIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Awesome, now I just have to wait for you to uprade your exhaust and dyno again
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 02:58 PM   #12
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

I'd like to see that too. I've had some discussions about the negetive effects of backpressure and I would love to remeasure the backpressure on your Vette after the upgrades and then see what the difference is on the dyno.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 04:02 PM   #13
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
I'd like to see that too. I've had some discussions about the negetive effects of backpressure and I would love to remeasure the backpressure on your Vette after the upgrades and then see what the difference is on the dyno.
I want to do it for sure, but new headers, cats, replumbed exhaust and new tune is going to be well over a grand and probably closer to two. I'll be putting that into the project car first. But I will get to this. Not quite sure how best to do it to isolate the effects of back pressure. Just inserting some hi-flow cats in place of the stock cats, measuring back pressure, and if essentially gone, dynoing might be the best way. Changing to LT headers, new injectors and tune, etc., there's just too many contributing factors to increased power.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 04:11 PM   #14
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
I want to do it for sure, but new headers, cats, replumbed exhaust and new tune is going to be well over a grand and probably closer to two. I'll be putting that into the project car first. But I will get to this. Not quite sure how best to do it to isolate the effects of back pressure. Just inserting some hi-flow cats in place of the stock cats, measuring back pressure, and if essentially gone, dynoing might be the best way. Changing to LT headers, new injectors and tune, etc., there's just too many contributing factors to increased power.
I agree. Just because there is no longer back pressure doesn't mean that the flow is optimum. Are your cats bolted in between the exhaust manifold and the aftercat or is it welded? If it is just bolted we could probably make a test pipe to replace the cat and then measure the back pressure again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 04:40 PM   #15
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
I agree. Just because there is no longer back pressure doesn't mean that the flow is optimum. Are your cats bolted in between the exhaust manifold and the aftercat or is it welded? If it is just bolted we could probably make a test pipe to replace the cat and then measure the back pressure again.
They're bolted. Pretty easy to remove actually. Good idea.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 04:54 PM   #16
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
They're bolted. Pretty easy to remove actually. Good idea.
Is it a straight shot? If so, it would be really easy to make them. Just go to Autozone and pick up some tube.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 10:13 PM   #17
BRIANBRIAN is offline
Senior Member
 
BRIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 285
Default

If I may hypothesize here, the torque curve will simply shift to the right on the dyno graph with only an exhaust size upgrade with no tune or cam replacement in mind.

edit: wait wait....if I have this right in my head, increasing the exhaust size too much would cause the curve to move to the right (RPM range). Why? Well I figure too large of an exhaust would take a higher amount of exhaust pressure to create velocity, in other words higher RPM's needed. Too small an exhaust we have a restriction of the velocity trying to release.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 10:34 PM   #18
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRIAN View Post
If I may hypothesize here, the torque curve will simply shift to the right on the dyno graph with only an exhaust size upgrade with no tune or cam replacement in mind.
I don't think so. If anything he'll see an increase across the entire range that the dyno sheet shows but mostly in the upper rpms. Remember that he already has a restriction that even at idle is creating 1 psi of pressure in the system and 3 psi with just a rev. I had a plugged cat on my Suburban and it didn't even have back pressure at an idle. It did however have 3 psi on a rev but only on one side.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:03 PM   #19
BRIANBRIAN is offline
Senior Member
 
BRIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Hmmmm I have my head rapped around this now. Need to find something else to occupy my time haha. We'll leave it up to the dyno

edit: YA! Without using any formulas and just winging it, anywhere between 2.5" and 2.75" should yield a better power curve. ^^^^This guys is right!! As I said though I think too large and the gains will only show on the top end. I don't know why I'm bringing all this up, it just snapped into my head this whole exhaust theory ordeal I heard about.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:14 PM   #20
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

You do realize that your car is already really fast don't you?
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 AM.