Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2009, 02:28 PM   #41
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Pieces of the rear end or the information?
Information, and in some cases, the rear end. It ranges from, 300whp on the stock NA rear end seems to be the upper limit, in which case we'll blow it up on the first launch probably, to they handle 500BHP and 10 second passes. I'm guess because we're roots, sticky tires and manual, we'll be at the lower end. I'm considering going straight to the 8.8, that way I can attempt to sell the stock unit and won't have to have two different drive shafts made. Don't have to decide yet, but something to keep rolling around upstairs. Plenty to do for now.


One person did mention an 8.8 IRS. Something like the stock HS and hubs are fine, but the ring and pinion give. Maybe slotting an 8.8 pumkin in there is in an interesting combination. . .
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 02:34 PM   #42
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Information, and in some cases, the rear end. It ranges from, 300whp on the stock NA rear end seems to be the upper limit, in which case we'll blow it up on the first launch probably, to they handle 500BHP and 10 second passes. I'm guess because we're roots, sticky tires and manual, we'll be at the lower end. I'm considering going straight to the 8.8, that way I can attempt to sell the stock unit and won't have to have two different drive shafts made. Don't have to decide yet, but something to keep rolling around upstairs. Plenty to do for now.


One person did mention an 8.8 IRS. Something like the stock HS and hubs are fine, but the ring and pinion give. Maybe slotting an 8.8 pumkin in there is in an interesting combination. . .

The IRS in the T-Birds and Cobra have the same 8.8 ring and pinion as the solid 8.8. The difference is that it uses half shafts that are not as strong as the solids axles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 02:44 PM   #43
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
The IRS in the T-Birds and Cobra have the same 8.8 ring and pinion as the solid 8.8. The difference is that it uses half shafts that are not as strong as the solids axles.
What kind of power is your style IRS known for reliably holding? With slicks, and the right spring/shock combo, hop won't be a problem. What about geometry? I wonder how difficult it would be to slot in an 8.8 IRS vs. Solid.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 02:58 PM   #44
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
What kind of power is your style IRS known for reliably holding? With slicks, and the right spring/shock combo, hop won't be a problem. What about geometry? I wonder how difficult it would be to slot in an 8.8 IRS vs. Solid.
Solid would be easier to install. My Cobra doesn't have the IRS but Seans does and so did my old 94 T-Bird I use to have. Not sure what they take in stock form but Sean hasn't blown his up yet. Then again he launches his car like a grandma and run radials.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:01 PM   #45
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Information, and in some cases, the rear end. It ranges from, 300whp on the stock NA rear end seems to be the upper limit, in which case we'll blow it up on the first launch probably, to they handle 500BHP and 10 second passes. I'm guess because we're roots, sticky tires and manual, we'll be at the lower end. I'm considering going straight to the 8.8, that way I can attempt to sell the stock unit and won't have to have two different drive shafts made. Don't have to decide yet, but something to keep rolling around upstairs. Plenty to do for now.


One person did mention an 8.8 IRS. Something like the stock HS and hubs are fine, but the ring and pinion give. Maybe slotting an 8.8 pumkin in there is in an interesting combination. . .
Darlene's T-bird has a 8.8 IRS....................a thought>
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:02 PM   #46
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
Solid would be easier to install. My Cobra doesn't have the IRS but Seans does and so did my old 94 T-Bird I use to have. Not sure what they take in stock form but Sean hasn't blown his up yet. Then again he launches his car like a grandma and run radials.
What's a solid 8.8 out of a Ranger go for these days?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:02 PM   #47
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Darlene's T-bird has a 8.8 IRS....................a thought>
Isn't that, uh, Darlene's car . . .
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:06 PM   #48
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
What's a solid 8.8 out of a Ranger go for these days?
Not sure but we are better off getting one out of an Explorer because it has disc brakes already instead of dumb I mean drum brakes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:11 PM   #49
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Isn't that, uh, Darlene's car . . .
Well, if she had something to drive other than the T-bird than we would have to get rid of the T-bird........................................... hint.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:19 PM   #50
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
Not sure but we are better off getting one out of an Explorer because it has disc brakes already instead of dumb I mean drum brakes.

In drag racing Drum brakes are better. I have 4 wheel drums on my Vette, ask Adam how well they work.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 PM.