Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-20-2009, 03:14 PM   #1
MassAppealMassAppeal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 96
Default E92 M3 chipped dyno results

Had a chance to put our buddys new M3 on the dyno to see what his chip would do (not sure what chip it is/ not familiar with German aftermarket)
everything else is stock
__________________
2008 WW Evo X
HBS tuned 404awhp 354tq 91oc-Tang!
2005 Yamaha R6

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:55 PM   #2
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

I thought those were rated at 400 BHP from the factor. Assuming a 17% driveline loss that should be 332WHP from the factory, give or take according to dyno and atmospheric conditions, etc.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 04:14 PM   #3
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
I thought those were rated at 400 BHP from the factor. Assuming a 17% driveline loss that should be 332WHP from the factory, give or take according to dyno and atmospheric conditions, etc.
414hp actually. It seems like a lot of drivetrain loss, but it is going through a 7-speed paddle shift transmission and that could account for the extra loss.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 04:18 PM   #4
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
414hp actually. It seems like a lot of drivetrain loss, but it is going through a 7-speed paddle shift transmission and that could account for the extra loss.
That'd be more like 20% off stock. Possible I guess, but that's like AWD cars now.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 05:18 PM   #5
MassAppealMassAppeal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 96
Default

yah this is the isf we did which I think is rated at 416 flywheel, seems to have less drive train loss
__________________
2008 WW Evo X
HBS tuned 404awhp 354tq 91oc-Tang!
2005 Yamaha R6

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 06:12 PM   #6
SoCalC55SoCalC55 is offline
Senior Member
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 540
Default

jesus... those are really really bad numbers IMO

for a 70K V8 M3.... wonder how much worse it is stock?

I know (for comparison purposes) I could pick up 13whp/15wtq with a basic chip alone


Stock Numbers(Motor Trend)
414 HP SAE @ 8,300 rpm; 295 ft lb @ 3,900 rpm
3700 Curb Weight
__________________
2006 C55 AMG
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 09:10 PM   #7
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalC55 View Post
jesus... those are really really bad numbers IMO

for a 70K V8 M3.... wonder how much worse it is stock?

I know (for comparison purposes) I could pick up 13whp/15wtq with a basic chip alone


Stock Numbers(Motor Trend)
414 HP SAE @ 8,300 rpm; 295 ft lb @ 3,900 rpm
3700 Curb Weight
I agree, the hp does seem low. The tq is actually high though
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 12:38 AM   #8
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalC55 View Post
jesus... those are really really bad numbers IMO

for a 70K V8 M3.... wonder how much worse it is stock?

I know (for comparison purposes) I could pick up 13whp/15wtq with a basic chip alone


Stock Numbers(Motor Trend)
414 HP SAE @ 8,300 rpm; 295 ft lb @ 3,900 rpm
3700 Curb Weight
So Mr. AMG, ZO6 v. M3. What say you?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 11:16 AM   #9
SoCalC55SoCalC55 is offline
Senior Member
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 540
Default

Z06 > New M3 > Me (on paper the M3 has me by half a second to 60. I havent been able to mess with one in the real world however; yet )

Although if I were to be more correct...

Z06 > C63 > M3


mmm Z06
__________________
2006 C55 AMG
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 12:05 PM   #10
ChateChate is offline
Senior Member
 
Chate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 325
Send a message via AIM to Chate
Default

Any dyno #s for a Vishnu tuned 335? They claim 420hp???
If so thats probably more cost effective than an M3! No gas guzzler tax either :P
__________________
Currently test driving every car I can think of...
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27 PM.