|
|
 |
|
01-21-2010, 10:29 AM
|
#1
|
|
Fast & Filthy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
|
Looking for 93-02 Camaro for a magazine install.
Hey, I wanted to check and see anybody has a 4th generation Camaro 93-02 that might be interested in allowing GTR High Performance to use their car for a tech story/project for Chevy Enthusiast Magazine. This will be a suspension build up story, so the Camaro must have a fairly stock suspension to begin with. Lowering springs are OK and performance shocks OK too. It would be a partially sponsored deal (50% off) from the manufacturers and from GTR, so they would be getting a huge savings.
Anyhow, here is a list of the items that will be installed for the story:
Adjustable panhard bar,
Strut tower brace
Rear Lower control arms
Rear lower control arm relocation brackets
Possible: may add subframe connectors to it as an option
Oh, it must be a Chevy Camaro (no Firebirds, etc...since it is a Chevy Magazine.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 02:15 PM
|
#2
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396
Hey, I wanted to check and see anybody has a 4th generation Camaro 93-02 that might be interested in allowing GTR High Performance to use their car for a tech story/project for Chevy Enthusiast Magazine. This will be a suspension build up story, so the Camaro must have a fairly stock suspension to begin with. Lowering springs are OK and performance shocks OK too. It would be a partially sponsored deal (50% off) from the manufacturers and from GTR, so they would be getting a huge savings.
Anyhow, here is a list of the items that will be installed for the story:
Adjustable panhard bar,
Strut tower brace
Rear Lower control arms
Rear lower control arm relocation brackets
Possible: may add subframe connectors to it as an option
Oh, it must be a Chevy Camaro (no Firebirds, etc...since it is a Chevy Magazine.
|
I found someone interested on LS1tech - should I have them contact GTR?
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 02:32 PM
|
#3
|
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396
Hey, I wanted to check and see anybody has a 4th generation Camaro 93-02 that might be interested in allowing GTR High Performance to use their car for a tech story/project for Chevy Enthusiast Magazine. This will be a suspension build up story, so the Camaro must have a fairly stock suspension to begin with. Lowering springs are OK and performance shocks OK too. It would be a partially sponsored deal (50% off) from the manufacturers and from GTR, so they would be getting a huge savings.
Anyhow, here is a list of the items that will be installed for the story:
Adjustable panhard bar,
Strut tower brace
Rear Lower control arms
Rear lower control arm relocation brackets
Possible: may add subframe connectors to it as an option
Oh, it must be a Chevy Camaro (no Firebirds, etc...since it is a Chevy Magazine.
|
Wait a minute, what year was the one you picked up for your pop?
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 03:10 PM
|
#4
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Wait a minute, what year was the one you picked up for your pop?
|
It's a third gen I believe.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 03:12 PM
|
#5
|
|
Fast & Filthy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk
I found someone interested on LS1tech - should I have them contact GTR?
|
Have him register here and PM me so I can talk to him first. Then I'll have him contact GTR.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Wait a minute, what year was the one you picked up for your pop?
|
Mine's a 3rd gen (1983). |
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396
. . .
Mine's a 3rd gen (1983).
|
Wasn't that a Crossfire Injection engine (maybe it was 84). If so, and you have the original L83 with the upper intake and airbox, I've heard they're worth a little bit of money (the intake/airbox, not the engine so much).
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 03:22 PM
|
#7
|
|
Resident Avatar Gambler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396
Have him register here and PM me so I can talk to him first. Then I'll have him contact GTR.
Mine's a 3rd gen (1983).
|
I just told him to PM you. Hopefully you hear something soon 
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 03:54 PM
|
#8
|
|
Fast & Filthy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Wasn't that a Crossfire Injection engine (maybe it was 84). If so, and you have the original L83 with the upper intake and airbox, I've heard they're worth a little bit of money (the intake/airbox, not the engine so much).
|
Nope, mine had a carb. I believe '84 was the first year for the crossfire injection in the Camaro but it was crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk
I just told him to PM you. Hopefully you hear something soon |
Thanks Sean, I'll wait to hear from him. |
|
|
|
|
01-21-2010, 10:46 PM
|
#9
|
|
Graphics B*tch
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
|
Lets get some crap for a 03-04 Mach1 magazine install!!
__________________
Adam
'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)
'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')
'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
|
|
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 08:22 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Wasn't that a Crossfire Injection engine (maybe it was 84). If so, and you have the original L83 with the upper intake and airbox, I've heard they're worth a little bit of money (the intake/airbox, not the engine so much).
|
Heres the scoop !! Whaoooo 165hp !!
[edit] 1982
.
The Z28 came standard with the 5.0 LG4 4bbl V8 or the optional LU5 twin TBI `Cross Fire Injection' 5.0 L. The carbureted engine was available with either a four-speed manual or three-speed automatic transmission and put out a 145 hp (108 kW), while the optional Cross Fire Injection 305 was rated at 165 hp (123 kW). Performance enthusiasts of the day gave the new Camaro rave reviews for its styling and handling, but also made critical remarks about the relatively low power ratings for both the Camaro Z28
__________________
I drive a hybrid, It burns gas and rubber..
Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
