Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2012, 03:05 PM   #1
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default Dyno variances

What do you guys think:

Vette doctors performance built my 416 and tuned it to 530 rwhp. The car runs great. I thought it would have run a little faster than the 122-125 trap speed that it ran at AAA.

I installed a FAST 103 and 102MM TB. We are almost done with the tuning and are around the 450 rwhp range.

The VD dyno was a land and sea dyno. The JBA dyno is a load bearing dyno. Do you guys think that there is enough difference in dynos for the huge difference in power.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 03:23 PM   #2
Shaolin CraneShaolin Crane is offline
pain's fun, hit me again
 
Shaolin Crane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,264
Default

If its a loaded dyno then very much so. One is probably a mustang dyno and the other is a dynojet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Lee
Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely — lay your life before him

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Stopping the world!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 05:53 PM   #3
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

That seems like too much to me. In my case I ran 380 and 391 on a mustang and dynojet respectively. The car was setup almost identically AIR.

Weren't you at 465 with your previous setup and running 122 traps? If so, that's a fair indicator this engine may simply not be making anywhere near 530 RWHP, which I would think in a Vette would put you closer to 130.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 06:47 PM   #4
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

The first H/C/I ls2 made 490 and would run 118-120. The ls3 stroker made 530 and would trap 120-123, almost 124. I thought it had more in it because it didn't feel like it pulled up top like the ls2. That's why I got the FAST and the TB. The only way to find out is to take it to the track.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 06:51 PM   #5
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

The first H/C/I ls2 made 490 and would run 118-120. The ls3 stroker made 530 and would trap 120-123, almost 124. I thought it had more in it because it didn't feel like it pulled up top like the ls2. That's why I got the FAST and the TB. The only way to find out is to take it to the track. I made more power after they were done then when I drove it in. I will go drag racing soon and see what she traps.

Regardless, I will have to put the car on a dynojet dyno for NASA.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 07:20 PM   #6
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

When's that gonna be? The 14th.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 07:40 PM   #7
kdracer73kdracer73 is offline
Senior Member
 
kdracer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,557
Default

Hot Rod mag did a dyno compare a few years ago. Same car taken to 4 shops without changes to the set up


And the whole article....

http://www.hotrod.com/techfaq/hrdp_0...e/viewall.html
__________________
I drive a hybrid, It burns gas and rubber..
Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:40 PM   #8
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

Not the 14th. Speedventures has a points systems that determines the class. I have enough point to force me into the unlimited class.

NASA is strictly a pounds per horsepower system (when you have a major engine mod). It will be in Jan or Feb.
__________________
2007 C6 z51 416ci, KW variant III, Wilwood WS6, Traqmate.
2005 F-350 PSD 4x4 DRW Lariat
2013 Mustang GT Grabber Blue, track pack, Brembo, Recaro, 3.73s
2009 Jetta Auto 2.5 liter
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:49 PM   #9
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdracer73 View Post
Hot Rod mag did a dyno compare a few years ago. Same car taken to 4 shops without changes to the set up


And the whole article....

http://www.hotrod.com/techfaq/hrdp_0...e/viewall.html
That's what I thought. The spread is not *that* big. 530 vs. 450 is pretty major. Maybe a combo of difference between Mustand and Dynojet and shit hot day vs. a nice cool day? Even that seems a little much.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:56 PM   #10
injdinjninjdinjn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 325
Default

How did they determine RWHP with just the motor?
Is that called a scientific guestimation, like global warming?

There are a myriad of variables between the flywheel and the where the rubber meets the road and every car is different.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.