Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2008, 10:54 AM   #1
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default 2010 Ford Taurus SHO ATTN: GUNFISH

Rumor is that Ford is working on a TT 3.5 V6 Ford Taurus SHO. Here is the text on the mules that have been running around with SHO on the dash:

"Could it be? Right in the midst of my own personal search for a mint Gen 1 (1989-1991) Taurus SHO comes pictoral proof that Ford may be resurrecting the Super High Output model. What we have here is one of many images published by Jalopnik showing the "SHO" moniker in its traditional font on the passenger side dash of a 2010 Ford Taurus.

What does it all mean? That's tough to say. The safe bet is that Ford may be developing a Taurus SHO concept car that could debut after the standard model is revealed at the 2009 Detroit Auto Show next month. It would also be safe to assume that a Taurus SHO would be powered by Ford's new EcoBoost V6, which is rumored to produce 350 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque. That's a heaping helping more than the 220 hp produced by the Yamaha-built 3.0L V6 in the original SHO, but there's also a lot more Taurus to haul around these days.

While it's possible that Ford could be adding the SHO trim level back to the Taurus line, we hope these pictures portend the arrival of a concept car only. You might be wondering how such an avid SHO fan could speak such blasphemy, and the answer is that today's Taurus is far removed from the original that shocked the industry back in 1986. Back then the Taurus was a mid-size family sedan with a futuristic design that broke the mold, and the SHO was heralded as an M3 at half the price when it arrived in 1989. Today's Taurus is just too big and expensive to wear those shoes, though an M5 on sale for 50% off sounds tempting. If we're being honest, however, a Fusion SHO tuned by SVT would be irresistible."
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 01:11 PM   #2
LeedomLeedom is offline
Graphics B*tch
 
Leedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
Default

A SHO fusion would be pretty cool. What I would like to see though is a Focus with a turbo to compete with the Neons/Evos/WRXs
__________________
Adam

'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)

'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')

'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:58 PM   #3
heypalheypal is offline
FWD = FAIL
 
heypal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 523
Default

Not going to happen.
__________________
I need more cowbell
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 09:44 PM   #4
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heypal View Post
Not going to happen.
You're just bitter because if they build the SHO it would mean you're not the only FWD Turbo 6 on the planet
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 01:52 AM   #5
heypalheypal is offline
FWD = FAIL
 
heypal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 523
Default

They would be stupid if they do that fwd turbo=stupid ass idea.
__________________
I need more cowbell
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 11:00 AM   #6
LeedomLeedom is offline
Graphics B*tch
 
Leedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heypal View Post
They would be stupid if they do that fwd turbo=stupid ass idea.
but only if someone does it on an Impala
__________________
Adam

'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)

'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')

'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 09:45 PM   #7
DJ DepDJ Dep is offline
Senior Member
 
DJ Dep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 107
Default

I'd like to see it, but in a 2-door model like the NASCAR version. 4-doors = Taxicab.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 09:52 PM   #8
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Dep View Post
I'd like to see it, but in a 2-door model like the NASCAR version. 4-doors = Taxicab.
There are some wicked badass 4 door cars these days. Consider the Cadillac CTS-V. Of course that ain't no Tuarus.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 10:00 PM   #9
DJ DepDJ Dep is offline
Senior Member
 
DJ Dep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
There are some wicked badass 4 door cars these days. Consider the Cadillac CTS-V. Of course that ain't no Tuarus.
4-doors = extra dead weight. Fine for a pops car/family sedan/taxicab. 2-doors are performance cars. Why carry the extra weight? Especially when you have a relatively small engine for power. There's a reason why NASCAR doesn't race 4-door bodies
And I am talking about the Busch cars. That COT cup car is a freaking joke. Toyota...bah!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 10:26 PM   #10
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Dep View Post
4-doors = extra dead weight. Fine for a pops car/family sedan/taxicab. 2-doors are performance cars. Why carry the extra weight? Especially when you have a relatively small engine for power. There's a reason why NASCAR doesn't race 4-door bodies
And I am talking about the Busch cars. That COT cup car is a freaking joke. Toyota...bah!!!
I agree for the most part, I think 470RWHP and 475RWTQ will get the job done nicely
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 AM.