[Shaolin Crane]

I got nothing back as well, still waiting to hear back from some of the other dudes.

[94cobra69ss396]

I heard back from the guy that had the '75 Bronco 302 and he still has it. I've asked for a phone number to call him at to confirm that it's complete. I'm pretty sure it is but I want to confirm. He's asking $100 but I think I can get it for less.

The advantage and disadvantage is that it is not a roller block. This means we could install a cheap hydraulic cam to it for about $120.

9:1 compression use:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K3601/

10:1 compression use:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K3602/

Let me know what you think and if you agree that this engine is a good choice or do you want to hold out for a roller block.

[Shaolin Crane]

That'll work fine as the heads have been converted to stud mount anyhow. Just need a computer and harness unless everyone else want to keep it carbed.

[94cobra69ss396]

Okay, I'll let you know once I hear back from him. He's in OC so maybe Ben would be able to pick it up if we can get it.

I say a carb will be cheaper and easier.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Edelbrock-To...sories&vxp=mtr

[Vettezuki]

Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396

Okay, I'll let you know once I hear back from him. He's in OC so maybe Ben would be able to pick it up if we can get it.

I say a carb will be cheaper and easier.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Edelbrock-To...sories&vxp=mtr

Just let me know once you've worked the deal and I can pick it up. Text me with the address, his name/number, final amount, and whatever else you think I need to know.

My only thought at all on ECU vs. Carb

SIMPLICITY
Carb > ECU

MPG
ECU > Carb

It's probably sort of a wash on net. Overall I lean towards anything that makes things dead balls reliable. Carbbed setups can be awesomely simple, make good power and be reliable as all hell . . . once they're dialed in for a particular environment. Atmospherically, the ECU is going to self adjust to changing conditions a bit better won't it? Certainly there's no comparisons to new computers.

[Vettezuki]

This is just a historical question. Weren't the older 302 blocks quite a bit weaker than the later ones used int he Foxes? Not that we'll be making that much power, so it doesn't really matter I suppose. Just a question. I thought they changed the casting designs at some point.

[94cobra69ss396]

They were all thin wall casting but the mid 70's are suppose to be stronger than the eary 80's blocks. We're not going to be spinning more than 6500 I would guess so the block will be plenty strong as will the cast crank and rods.

[Shaolin Crane]

Originally Posted by Vettezuki

This is just a historical question. Weren't the older 302 blocks quite a bit weaker than the later ones used int he Foxes? Not that we'll be making that much power, so it doesn't really matter I suppose. Just a question. I thought they changed the casting designs at some point.

Thinner walls but heavier nickle content, so typically stronger then the later roller blocks

[Vettezuki]

Any news?

[94cobra69ss396]

Nope, I haven't heard back ever since I asked for a phone number. I'll try sending another PM.