|
|
|
09-24-2009, 12:12 PM
|
#31
|
Neanderthal
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
I think it was Roland.
|
Ok, not the same guy. My guy (sounds weird) used to love to put that damn wankel engine in planes. Told me that he got more power and it was smoother.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 12:31 PM
|
#32
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64
Ok, not the same guy. My guy (sounds weird) used to love to put that damn wankel engine in planes. Told me that he got more power and it was smoother.
|
The power per size, packaging, yes. They do some trick things, making peripheral ports, Turbos and even using some kind of turbo mechanism to drive the input shaft from the main pulley. This guy Roland said that with all tricks in place and dialed they can achieve thermal effeciencies approaching 50%. I rather doubt that, but it sounds like they can get them pretty high. Compared to other automotive (not aviation) piston driven engines.
- relatively light
- small
- virtually endless duty cycle
- well suited to turbo applications
- definitely smoother (two rotor)
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 12:50 PM
|
#33
|
Internet Tough Guy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
The power per size, packaging, yes. They do some trick things, making peripheral ports, Turbos and even using some kind of turbo mechanism to drive the input shaft from the main pulley. This guy Roland said that with all tricks in place and dialed they can achieve thermal effeciencies approaching 50%. I rather doubt that, but it sounds like they can get them pretty high. Compared to other automotive (not aviation) piston driven engines.
- relatively light
- small
- virtually endless duty cycle
- well suited to turbo applications
- definitely smoother (two rotor)
|
on the 50% efficiencies.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#34
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BADDASSC6
on the 50% efficiencies.
|
As far as I know, only the newest two stroke turbo diesels used in cargo shipping (gigantic engines) approach 50%. Other than that, some trick natural gas turbines in generator plants that capture and use waste heat to drive additional steam turbines (I think) get up there or slightly beyond. But these are industrial scale engines/power generators.
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:02 PM
|
#35
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
|
If I had a 400hp+ Turbo Rotary laying around in the garage before I built the stroker I would have put it in the Vette.
I would still love to do something like that to piss off guys like Bird and Glenn.
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:12 PM
|
#36
|
Neanderthal
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette
I would still love to do something like that to piss off guys like Bird and Glenn.
|
No, you don't!!!!!
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 03:06 PM
|
#37
|
I, Vettezuki
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64
No, you don't!!!!!
|
Yes we do. Peripheral port 20BT, gimme a holla!
__________________
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen on To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (active)
Motorgen Project Car To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (back burner)
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:00 PM
|
#38
|
Neanderthal
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Yes we do. Peripheral port 20BT, gimme a holla!
|
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 06:24 PM
|
#39
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki
Yes we do. Peripheral port 20BT, gimme a holla!
|
Holla atcha boi son!
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 06:28 PM
|
#40
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
|
Ben!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so excited, can't talk!!! New idea!!!
20B single Turbo in a 2nd gen Camaro for the next project car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
I <3 forced induction.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|