Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2009, 04:48 PM   #371
joedlsjoedls is offline
Senior Member
 
joedls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Cams?
See pic above
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

HP numbers are good and all, but they are like asking someone how much they can bench. What difference does it make if I can still kick your ass?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 04:48 PM   #372
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Just FYI,

I'm pretty much striking out everywhere I look for 174 parts, and the blower services aren't getting back to me. I would be interested in going NA if the 174 doesn't work, but if we do, I'd like to make it kinda gnarly by going to a nasty solid cam/lifters (would also have to change springs since they're being setup for the mild hydraulic blower cam we have now). I think this is pretty much what Ron and Bird had in mind. But the big thing I'd like to try in this case is to go E85. That would be our challenge as well as our little talking point. I'm guessing, but an aggressive E85 tune (cool charge, 105~ octane) on a high spinning big cam, LT headers, etc. should be good for hi 300s maybe even crack a 400 to the wheels on the 306. We could also keep the IRS and that plus not having the blower means the car would be quite a bit lighter, maybe down to <=2,500lbs.

I think the hydraulic roller springs will work fine with a solid flat tappet. They usually have a higher spring rate for heavier weight of the lifters but that will work well because we need more spring pressure for the higher rpm.

Check to see what the open and closed spring rates are when you pick up the heads. Also check to see what the max lift he says you can use. We can check to see what the cam manufacturer recommends for the cam we want to run and compare.

I'm also not using the springs that are recommended for my cam. I'm running a solid roller that needs more spring pressure with springs designed for a flat tappet cam but because I only turn 6500 they worked fine. I accidently over rev'd the engine doing a burnout when I first put it together and hit valve float at 7200. Now after 2 years of racing the engine stops pulling after 6000.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 04:50 PM   #373
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
One. FMI, knowing what cams would you recommend.?

Ok, what rear gear are WE going to run? Are you thinking flat tappet or solid roller??


Just thinking tunnel ram with TWO 500 performers or 360 Holleys.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 04:51 PM   #374
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Ok, what rear gear are WE going to run? Are you thinking flat tappet or solid roller??
I would say flat tappet due to cost.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 05:02 PM   #375
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Ok, what rear gear are WE going to run? Are you thinking flat tappet or solid roller??


Just thinking tunnel ram with TWO 500 performers or 360 Holleys.
The axle we have is a 4.1. I'd run a fairly short tire (26~) for aesthetic reasons. That means this little mill would need to spin to reach higher speeds.

Why two carbs? What's the theory?

What's the real difference in cost between flat tappet and solid roller? What's the performance "hit" for flat tappet vs. solid roller if the intent is to spin the hell out of a 5L? Also what about durability and maintenance? I don't know much about this subject, but does a solid roller setup require regular tweaking because of the lash with the lifters? Sorry, I just don't know much about this detail of engine internals.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 05:05 PM   #376
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedls View Post
See pic above
Sorry, I'm behind a firewall and couldn't see. Had to "step outside". This looks awesome . . . and expensive.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 05:05 PM   #377
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
I would say flat tappet due to cost.
Here's a start:


# 31-641-5 600 I 593 E lift Dur at .050- 265 I 276 E with LSA of 106.

This, of course is just a guide line.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 05:12 PM   #378
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Why two carbs? What's the theory?


Well, the "WOW" factor and better balance for each runner on a Tunnel Ram.

One barrel for each port. KINDA like FI.

Cost for a cam kit in Solid lifter is much better than a Roller by about 4x.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 06:38 PM   #379
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default Spring Info, Cam Rec

Just picked up the heads. I'll put up some pics later. Because the first castings that were sent out were the wrong ones they threw in some bowl work, whatever that means.

SPRINGS
Seat Pressure 150lbs.
Open Pressure, he said he couldn't give an exact number without knowing the exact cam, but based on what I told him (.540 lift, hydraulic roller) he said high 300s low 400s max.
He said they'll safely support .700 lift

BASIC CAM RECOMMENDATION
He said we could run a solid flat tappet with these springs, BUT unless we were going to port the heads and were willing to be careful with break in and do maintenance, there wasn't really that much advantage. He recommended sticking with a nice big high lift hydraulic roller and be done with it for simplicity's sake. Basically it's the point of diminishing returns.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 06:47 PM   #380
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default MP112 vs. 174

What are the blower dynamics of the MagnaCharger MP112 vs. the Holley 174?

As I mentioned earlier, there is a seller on eBay that has brand new MP112 carburated models for $500 (just the blower, no intake or pulleys). Pacific Performance, where I got the heads, actually made and apparently still has in stock a couple offset Dizzie drives that take an MSD cap. They were specifically designed to give clearance to Roots blowers on 289/302 SBF. We'd have to modifiy an intake or create and adapter for the MP112, as well as figure out front drive, but this is possible. Just throwing it out as an option. I'll call PSE on Monday to see what they can do with the 174.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 PM.