Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2012, 02:42 PM   #21
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

And from what I understand is that the LS3 Heads flow better then the LS7 heads on the low end but die out on the top
__________________
2006 CTS-V
1993 Trooper
1991 Impulse RS
1988 Trooper II SAS
1986 TrooperII (No Rear)
1988 Impulse (dead)
1983 K20
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 02:45 PM   #22
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

From wikipedia about the ls2

Quote:
It is similar to the high-performance LS6, but with improved torque throughout the rpm range. The LS2 uses the "243" casting heads used on the LS6 (although without the sodium filled valves), a smaller camshaft, and an additional 18 cubic inches. The compression of the LS2 was also raised to 10.9:1 compared to the LS1s 10.25:1 and the LS6s 10.5:1
__________________
2006 CTS-V
1993 Trooper
1991 Impulse RS
1988 Trooper II SAS
1986 TrooperII (No Rear)
1988 Impulse (dead)
1983 K20
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 04:30 PM   #23
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackax View Post
And from what I understand is that the LS3 Heads flow better then the LS7 heads on the low end but die out on the top
Ls3 heads flow great up top with the right cam. If anything port velocity can suffer when the heads get ported too much, losing a bit of torque on the bottom end. It depends on cam selection but Ive seen LS3's make great power up to 6800rpm or higher. The intake ports and valves are so big that you dont need as much duration on the intake side and the right cam can maximize the exhaust velocity.

I think the 6.2L motors are fast becoming the best bang for the buck project motors. A brand new set of GMPP LS3 heads cost me $640 for the pair, new and complete. Also, so many trucks/suvs and cars have the 6.2L that theyre getting easier to find.
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 04:47 PM   #24
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

I think the C6 LS3 revs up to 6600 but the stock valve springs suck luckily they can get away with a smaller cam due to how good those big valves flow. Maybe thats why some may say they "die up top" vs an LS7, being stock that is.
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 04:58 PM   #25
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C5Natie View Post
Ls3 heads flow great up top with the right cam. If anything port velocity can suffer when the heads get ported too much, losing a bit of torque on the bottom end. It depends on cam selection but Ive seen LS3's make great power up to 6800rpm or higher. The intake ports and valves are so big that you dont need as much duration on the intake side and the right cam can maximize the exhaust velocity.

I think the 6.2L motors are fast becoming the best bang for the buck project motors. A brand new set of GMPP LS3 heads cost me $640 for the pair, new and complete. Also, so many trucks/suvs and cars have the 6.2L that theyre getting easier to find.
I agree on the power the stock heads can make with the LS3 I was just comparing them to the LS7 head.

I'm a fan of all the gen IV small blocks (ls2,ls3,ls7) I love my LS2 and the truck blocks are so nice for huge boost numbers (cant beat iron blocks in huge Fi numbers)
__________________
2006 CTS-V
1993 Trooper
1991 Impulse RS
1988 Trooper II SAS
1986 TrooperII (No Rear)
1988 Impulse (dead)
1983 K20
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 05:09 PM   #26
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

Yeah, theyre very similar heads. LS7 intake valves are 2.20" vs the LS3 2.165" and theyre cc is for a 4.10" bore minimum so theyre gonna flow a bit more up top. Thats why they got crazy top end. But now even regular LS3 Vettes are hitting 180mph+ stock. Crazy. We are now in the golden age of performance, muscle cars cant touch this technology.
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 05:16 PM   #27
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

Heres a thread with a guy, screen name Burrhos, making 517rwhp/462rwtq with cam only bolt on LS3 C6, n/a. Ran 10.67@129mph. See post #8.

http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation...ed-please.html
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 12:34 PM   #28
RyridesmotoxRyridesmotox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 510
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian View Post
Isn't the LS6 505hp stock compared to 420hp?
405hp in the z06. Other applications like the CTS-v and the GTO have other outputs I think. Just figured I would answer your question. And the sodium filled valves thing is actually pretty sweet. Apparently it allows the valves to remain cooler or something like that.

I agree with you Natie, this is the golden age of performance. You cant find a muslce car that will get over 400hp and still get almost 30mpg like a vette. The technology is amazing now. My cobalt motor internals can handle 500whp from the factory. The LS blocks are total beasts, and the OHV pushrod design is tried and true, and I don't think its reliability and power can really be questioned.
__________________
The Tow Pig: 2013 Silverado 1500 crew cab

The Race Car lol: 2004 Cadillac CTS-V... With things.

Better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 09:12 AM   #29
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

Well, I got a lot done this past weekend starting thursday. Got the motor in and assembled it. Turned it over to prime the oiling system and connected the converter box. Should start it up today and button up the car. I'll post some pics of what Ive been up to. Looking forward to getting video of start up, if it starts, and idle, if it stays idling. Lol

Thanks to my friends Carlos, Adrian and my uncle William for lending a hand this weekend. And NO-Xplode for giving me the energy.
__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 09:13 AM   #30
C5NatieC5Natie is offline
Senior Member
 
C5Natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

Made the notch for the bracket to fit. Not pretty but it worked.


__________________
YIYIYIYIYIYI, LIVE ACTION!
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 PM.