Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
View Poll Results: Which Mustang would you rather have (assuming same price, drivetrain, etc)
A 5.0L DOHC V8 with 400hp/400tq 9 47.37%
A 3.5L Twin Turbo V6 with 400hp/400tq 10 52.63%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2009, 10:24 AM   #21
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
Very true. I've heard tuning the SHO is difficult at this point
All new cars are difficult to tune until they figure out the code. Give the aftermarket a year and they will have hundreds of tunes. I did read though that the turbos are really small and that is going to be your limiting factor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 04:16 PM   #22
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
All new cars are difficult to tune until they figure out the code. Give the aftermarket a year and they will have hundreds of tunes. I did read though that the turbos are really small and that is going to be your limiting factor.
True. I have also heard the other limiting factor may be the transaxle. In the FWD setup I guess it can't handle the torque. Now in the Mustang though it wouldn't be a problem
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 05:45 PM   #23
BRIANBRIAN is offline
Senior Member
 
BRIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Yeah the new SHO looks nice from a luxury point of view, I don't think I would want to mess with tuning a ride like that in the first place. Although I don't doubt the 8 year old's of today will be picking these up and modding them blindly 10 years from now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 09:18 PM   #24
LeedomLeedom is offline
Graphics B*tch
 
Leedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
Default

A turbo is quickly pumped up in HP but has a lower ceiling. Bang for buck can you really go wroing with the TT V6? Did I just say that... must be the captain (moragn) talking.
__________________
Adam

'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)

'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')

'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:06 AM   #25
BADDASSC6BADDASSC6 is offline
Internet Tough Guy
 
BADDASSC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
Yeah, the reason I went with the V6 TT is because of the forged parts, and I figure you could easily get to 500hp with around 1k in mods. The 5.0 obviously wouldn't be forged and putting a blower on would be more money, but ultimately it'd be a lost faster
?????? Why wouldn't it be forged???? The 4.6 DOHC had forged internals????


Here is what it comes down to:
Budget build go witht the six get a boost controller and ditch the cats.
Want to dominate go with the 8.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 01:23 PM   #26
eric97sraderic97srad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 83
Send a message via AIM to eric97srad Send a message via MSN to eric97srad Send a message via Yahoo to eric97srad Send a message via Skype™ to eric97srad
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPlunk View Post
Given the choice (I know this is blasphemy), my vote goes for the TT V6. For purposes of this poll, assume you are choosing a starting point and would mod each car according to personal preference.
Yes, blasphemy.

Bang for the buck factor aside, I'd still have to go for the V8 in the Mustang. It's only logical... Now, take that TTV6 and put it in yet another attempt at a new T-bird (something similar to the late 80's early 90's SC) and I could go that route for the right price.
__________________
Eric

89 Mustang LX 5.0 (FOX)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

97 Explorer 5.0 (GROCERY-GETTER)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

97 GSX-R 750 (GIXXER)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 09:23 AM   #27
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

I just read an article in Popular Hot Rodding about the EcoBoost V6. Turns out that it has a forged crank but the rods and pistons are cast. Even with those they are still using 10:1 compression and 12psi of boost and it can run on 87 octane. It's all because of the direct injection. However, for added safety the Bosch ECU can pull out up to 20 degrees of timing.

It also said that the turbos are 48mm Garrett GT15s. They are said to be capable of 200hp a piece so it looks like peak hp will be around 400 at the flywheel unless the turbos are upgraded. I'm not sure that you would want to go any higher than that with cast pistons anyways. Hopefully they will offer a higher hp version later on that has forged pistons and rods.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 11:38 AM   #28
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
I just read an article in Popular Hot Rodding about the EcoBoost V6. Turns out that it has a forged crank but the rods and pistons are cast. Even with those they are still using 10:1 compression and 12psi of boost and it can run on 87 octane. It's all because of the direct injection. However, for added safety the Bosch ECU can pull out up to 20 degrees of timing.

It also said that the turbos are 48mm Garrett GT15s. They are said to be capable of 200hp a piece so it looks like peak hp will be around 400 at the flywheel unless the turbos are upgraded. I'm not sure that you would want to go any higher than that with cast pistons anyways. Hopefully they will offer a higher hp version later on that has forged pistons and rods.
Great info - thanks!

It's interesting though, I have heard from a couple Ford insider guys that the EcoBoost is good for about 450hp as is. Maybe those mules had bigger turbos
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 09:52 PM   #29
trymev8trymev8 is offline
Member
 
trymev8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 67
Default

if i were to buy an american car it would have to have a v8. It is a heritage thing in my opinion.
__________________
2000 silverstone honda s2000
HP= 240
Torque= Honda is still figuring out how to make this
1/4 mile= i dont know i was autocrossing through the cones that divided the two lanes
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 10:25 PM   #30
LeedomLeedom is offline
Graphics B*tch
 
Leedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
Turns out that it has a forged crank but the rods and pistons are cast. Even with those they are still using 10:1 compression...
I think they made another engine like that. If I could only remember which one?
__________________
Adam

'13 Ford Fusion SE (2.0L EcoBoost)(Conor)

'03 Zinc Yellow Mach 1(Yazmine)
290HP / 305TQ
1/4 mile ET: 13.28 @ 101MPH (1.867 60')

'99 White F-150 (4.6L)(Bud Jr.)-gone but never forgotten
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:31 AM.