Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2009, 01:33 PM   #91
94cobra69ss39694cobra69ss396 is offline
Fast & Filthy
 
94cobra69ss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
Assuming 26.1 tires (275/50x15) our transmission and a 6,000rpm shift point/red line, I think we' could take advantage of the taller 3.55 gears.

3.55 = 127mph
3.73 = 121mph

I think we'll have the power to weight to ring out the taller gear and have a faster trap/et.
Can you run a 28 inch tire with 3.73 gears and tell me what mph you show for 6000rpm?

Also know that a Slick will grow as you go sown the track. So if we use a 26 inch slick it will act like a taller tire further down.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:39 PM   #92
big2birdbig2bird is offline
Power's off.
 
big2bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Ok, with my 3:55s I hit 119 in third gear. That's with a 27.9 (P275 15 60) inch on the 3,000 pound vette. So.......................I don't see how your math is right. Math and the real world don't always jive. Just not sure about it is all.
Glenn, what do think about raising the duration/retarding the cam, installing really stiff springs, and raising the redline? (Think Beehives)
__________________
Chrome don't get you home.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:42 PM   #93
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Ok, with my 3:55s I hit 119 in third gear. That's with a 27.9 (P275 15 60) inch on the 3,000 pound vette. So.......................I don't see how your math is right. Math and the real world don't always jive. Just not sure about it is all.
The weight is irrelevant, what was your rpm at 119rpm? Your math might be fine. Mine rocks.

Here's a nice accurate graph of a wide ratio top loader, 3.55 gears and 275/50x15 tires. The engine turns the trans turns the axle (not a lop of slop there) turns the tires. Pressure and rotational inertia can have some effect on "real" diameter and effect total final "gearing", but the margin of error would be a couple mph at most I would think.

__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:46 PM   #94
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big2bird View Post
Glenn, what do think about raising the duration/retarding the cam, installing really stiff springs, and raising the redline? (Think Beehives)
Ok, when I had my 289 Hipo it would run to 7000+ rpms with the solid lifter factory cam and stock valve springs. The problem we have here is the unknown cam. I think a switch to a known cam with soild lifter/roller will allow the 302 to rev more freely. Beehives are a thought, but cost factor will be an issue.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:46 PM   #95
big2birdbig2bird is offline
Power's off.
 
big2bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 673
Default

If weight is irrelevent, let's make the RX 20,000lbs. Should be good for traction.
__________________
Chrome don't get you home.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:47 PM   #96
big2birdbig2bird is offline
Power's off.
 
big2bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
Ok, when I had my 289 Hipo it would run to 7000+ rpms with the solid lifter factory cam and stock valve springs. The problem we have here is the unknown cam. I think a switch to a known cam with soild lifter/roller will allow the 302 to rev more freely. Beehives are a thought, but cost factor will be an issue.
That MUST change . The cam is EVERYTHING.
__________________
Chrome don't get you home.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:51 PM   #97
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big2bird View Post
Glenn, what do think about raising the duration/retarding the cam, installing really stiff springs, and raising the redline? (Think Beehives)
What about blower effeciency? I was under the impression these smaller roots blowers will start to fall on their face from 5,500 - 6,000 rpm.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:52 PM   #98
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
The weight is irrelevant, what was your rpm at 119rpm? Your math might be fine. Mine rocks.

Here's a nice accurate graph of a wide ratio top loader, 3.55 gears and 275/50x15 tires. The engine turns the trans turns the axle (not a lop of slop there) turns the tires. Pressure and rotational inertia can have some effect on "real" diameter and effect total final "gearing", but the margin of error would be a couple mph at most I would think.

Weight is always a factor

If I remember correctly it was around 6200 to 6500 rpm. I'm just saying a 3.55 gear MIGHT be too tall in the real world. I remember when I was running the 1/4 I was just shifting into forth just before I hit the light with the 3.55s.


Not saying you are wrong , just stating a little real world testing would help here.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:52 PM   #99
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big2bird View Post
If weight is irrelevent, let's make the RX 20,000lbs. Should be good for traction.
Weight is irrelevant for calculating gearing and "potential" speed you silly goose.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:55 PM   #100
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94cobra69ss396 View Post
Can you run a 28 inch tire with 3.73 gears and tell me what mph you show for 6000rpm?

Also know that a Slick will grow as you go sown the track. So if we use a 26 inch slick it will act like a taller tire further down.
I have to go for a few hours, I'll run this later. But yes, the tire changes in diameter is where the real world differences in speed as a function of gearing changes.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM.