Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2010, 11:39 AM   #21
enkeivetteenkeivette is offline
Super Moderator
 
enkeivette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,850
Default

If it's not common knowledge: Roots blowers make more heat and will need a lower (8:1) CR to make decent boost. Centrifugal and turbos can make less heat and you would only need to drop the CR down to around (9:1) or even keep it as high as 9.5:1 for the same, if not higher, boost levels.

I don't know why everyone crys about the Procharger kits. The only thing that looks cheap in the kit is the BOV, and you can buy a fancy Greddy one if it bothers you that much. The mounting bracket is thicker than my engine block walls and I could drive over the bonnet with my car and it would hold its shape. So I don't know what everyone considers cheap in the kit. Everyone seems to agree they make awesome head units, which is really all that you should care about.

If I were you I'd look for the cheapest option to lower compression, and see how much you can actually lower it, then make your selection based on that. If you find a sweet deal on a set of pistons do that. Otherwise, new heads. If you land around 8:1, consider the roots, otherwise look at the turbos. If you're lazy and you can't drop the compression more than 9:1, centrifugal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 12:02 PM   #22
blackaxblackax is offline
Senior Member
 
blackax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enkeivette View Post
If it's not common knowledge: Roots blowers make more heat and will need a lower (8:1) CR to make decent boost. Centrifugal and turbos can make less heat and you would only need to drop the CR down to around (9:1) or even keep it as high as 9.5:1 for the same, if not higher, boost levels.

I don't know why everyone crys about the Procharger kits. The only thing that looks cheap in the kit is the BOV, and you can buy a fancy Greddy one if it bothers you that much. The mounting bracket is thicker than my engine block walls and I could drive over the bonnet with my car and it would hold its shape. So I don't know what everyone considers cheap in the kit. Everyone seems to agree they make awesome head units, which is really all that you should care about.

If I were you I'd look for the cheapest option to lower compression, and see how much you can actually lower it, then make your selection based on that. If you find a sweet deal on a set of pistons do that. Otherwise, new heads. If you land around 8:1, consider the roots, otherwise look at the turbos. If you're lazy and you can't drop the compression more than 9:1, centrifugal.

You wont need to lower the CR if your not pushing that much boost. My car ran stock CR 10.9:1 at 7 pounds with no problems (people have run up to 12 psi stock) i'm sure the ls1 can take a few pounds before you need to start to even think about lowing the CR
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 12:07 PM   #23
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackax View Post
You wont need to lower the CR if your not pushing that much boost. My car ran stock CR 10.9:1 at 7 pounds with no problems (people have run up to 12 psi stock) i'm sure the ls1 can take a few pounds before you need to start to even think about lowing the CR
FI for me it would mean lowering compression for sure. I'm over 11:1 (how much ) and need to bump the gas to 93 in the summer especially. This wold be a big dollar move that isn't in the cards any time soon; just doing some casual thinking about that options.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 05:04 PM   #24
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
FI for me it would mean lowering compression for sure. I'm over 11:1 (how much ) and need to bump the gas to 93 in the summer especially. This wold be a big dollar move that isn't in the cards any time soon; just doing some casual thinking about that options.
I know I've said this before---just a quick opening up ( and smoothing) of the chambers will lower your compression enough to live with the high compression.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 05:41 PM   #25
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUTAL64 View Post
I know I've said this before---just a quick opening up ( and smoothing) of the chambers will lower your compression enough to live with the high compression.
After finishing RX-Snake, we'll do some stuff, including popping the heads and taking a look. I have some sodium filled valves waiting too.

This was a different question. In my case, I can legally (:mad) install an STS Turbo setup or Pro Charger setup. I was just ruminating on the Pros and Cons between those two. Personally, I'd be into a Twin Screw, but there is no EO/CARB cert for my "2001 F Body".
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 05:03 PM   #26
BRUTAL64BRUTAL64 is offline
Neanderthal
 
BRUTAL64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
After finishing RX-Snake, we'll do some stuff, including popping the heads and taking a look. I have some sodium filled valves waiting too.

This was a different question. In my case, I can legally (:mad) install an STS Turbo setup or Pro Charger setup. I was just ruminating on the Pros and Cons between those two. Personally, I'd be into a Twin Screw, but there is no EO/CARB cert for my "2001 F Body".
Pro Charger is my thought. Simple, clean and smooth.
__________________
64 Vette Roadster 400 ci
1990 F150 351 ci SuperCharged
48 Harley Pan Head 76 ci
2016 Nissan Altma
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.