Home
Don't have an account? Create one now! It's always free!


Forgot Password
Ed's Auto Parts - Mention MOTORGEN for a Discount!
Motorgen Sponsor: McLeod Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: American Muscle - Add style and performance to your Stang
Motorgen Sponsor: Hall Fabrication & Racing
Motorgen Sponsor: Injectors Plus - Performance Fuel Delivery Systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2009, 09:35 PM   #1
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default 4th and 5th Gen Camaro Pictures

Holy hell the new car looks big





  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 12:15 AM   #2
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

It's incredible how big cars are now compared to back in the day. Check it out:

Old Mustang vs. New



Old Challenger vs. New




Old Camaro vs. New


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 12:56 AM   #3
VettezukiVettezuki is offline
I, Vettezuki
 
Vettezuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,754
Default

Some of this looks like it might be an optical contusion (as my brother is fond of saying). How abut some cold hard numbers, both absolute and in ratio form. In other words, wheel base, length, track, width, height, interior space (cubic feet), etc. We know weight is on the whole much higher, but that's mostly to do with safety features. But I suspect these cars may "feel" larger than they are relative to their ancestors.

For example, look at the length, belt line and roof line:


Look at the hood height a roof height:


My guess is that these cars really aren't all that larger in their "foot print" or "box" of space they consume, but they fill that box in a more puffed up way. Giving the appearance of being even larger than they are. Just a hypothesis.
__________________
Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen on
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(active)
Motorgen Project Car
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(back burner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 10:23 AM   #4
SoCalC55SoCalC55 is offline
Senior Member
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 540
Default

As much as i like a 02 SS... damn it looks like crap next to the new one IMO

Now the classic SS on the other hand... hawt
__________________
2006 C55 AMG
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 12:46 PM   #5
SeanPlunkSeanPlunk is offline
Resident Avatar Gambler
 
SeanPlunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,997
Send a message via AIM to SeanPlunk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettezuki View Post
My guess is that these cars really aren't all that larger in their "foot print" or "box" of space they consume, but they fill that box in a more puffed up way. Giving the appearance of being even larger than they are. Just a hypothesis.
____________________Gen 4 Camaro__________________Gen 5 Camaro

Specificatios__________2-door hatchback______________2-door hatchback
Wheelbase, in.________101.1_________________________112.3
Overall Length, in._____193.2_________________________190.4
Overall Width, in.______74.1__________________________75.5
Overall Height, in. _____51.3__________________________54.2
Curb Weight, lbs.______3306__________________________3780
Cargo Volume, cu. ft.__12.9-33.7
Standard Payload, lbs._--
Fuel Capacity, gals.___15.5___________________________19
Seating Capacity______4_____________________________4
Front Head Room, in.____37.2_________________________37.4
Max. Frn Leg Room,in.___43.0_________________________42.4
Rear Head Room, in.____35.3__________________________35.3
Max. Rr Leg Room, in.___26.8__________________________29.9

From the specs it appears to be no optical illusion - the new car is dimensionally bigger in basically every way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 08:25 PM   #6
Sonic03SVTSonic03SVT is offline
Senior Member
 
Sonic03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Default

3780 lbs? HA! Guess all that talk from the Camaro fanbois about 3400 lbs was just as ridiculous as i thought. Cmon 3400lb '11 GT with the 5.0 DOHC
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 10:55 AM   #7
silentbob97silentbob97 is offline
Junior Member
 
silentbob97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 18
Default

Where did you get those pics? Is the camaro out already! I think the designers did an excellent job that is one sick car!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:10 PM.