Thread: 2005 WRX tuning
View Single Post
Old 11-29-2009, 12:10 PM   #14
axotlprogenyaxotlprogeny is offline
Member
 
axotlprogeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 42
Default

You completely right. E85 has much less energy density than gasoline. I found a nice table on Wikipedia listing a comparison between Gas, E85 and 100% ethanol:



Gasoline stoichiometric AFR = 14.7 Lambda = 1
Gasoline max power rich AFR = 12.5 Lambda = 0.8503
Gasoline max power lean AFR = 13.23 Lambda = 0.900
E10 stoichiometric AFR = 14.0-14.1 Lambda = 1
E85 stoichiometric AFR = 9.765 Lambda = 1
E85 max power rich AFR = 6.975 Lambda = 0.7143
E85 max power lean AFR = 8.4687 Lambda = 0.8673
E100 stoichiometric AFR = 9.0078 Lambda = 1
E100 max power rich AFR = 6.429 Lambda = 0.714
E100 max power lean AFR = 7.8 Lambda = 0.870

Something else that goes hand in hand with this is the Stoichiometry of Regular E10 fuel used in California.

I have 740cc injectors. My car likes my injector flow scaling to be set about 5% lower than the actual flow (Flow Scaler = 703cc/min, Actual Flow = 740cc/min), which lines up pretty close to the difference between pure gas and E10. I don't know if this is the proper way of handling this, but it seem to work pretty well.
__________________
2005 WRX Wagon

Engine
- APS SR-30 Turbo
- Titek Bellmouth catted downpipe
- Borla Catback
- Boost Cooler Methanol Injection with VCS-25 controller
- GM Boost control solenoid
- Open Source tuned

Chassis
-Perrin Anti-lift kit
-22mm SPT rear swaybar
  Reply With Quote