The Supra is faster than any LS1.
 

Per wikipedia :lmfao:

Weren't they just as fast? I know a Z28 pulled off a 12.9, wasn't the Supra 13 flat or 12.9 or something like that?

Stock for stock an LS1 Vette for sure would be quicker than a stock Supra. I think someone was just having a little fun editing and it hasn't been changed yet :thumbs_up:

so wat where the times for the ls1, vette, camaro, ws6, and gto, and wat was the real time of a 1994 supra TT? im a lil curious of this and then just for run wat is the time for a 1993+ rx-7, 1996 or 1997 3000gt vr4, and the 1993 300zx TT? which was faster?

I believe all of those are mid 13 second cars stock on average. I know an LS1 Vette could run 12's.

Z28 with a 6 speed ran a 12.9, stock tires, stock everything down to the muffler.

oh wow i never knew that? a z28 is like a 98 camaro right? my friend had that but maybe he was a bad driver which explains y he was slower then what u said hahaha

For sure, that was with a professional driver if I remember correctly. You could own that car your whole life and never break 13. Sean had one and his best was 13.4 I think.

ohh ok ya he would always get 13.4's. i guess it comes with rwd car's.

I don't know too much about the 93-98 supras, but I believe the HP rating that is shown is incorrect. It's 280HP in japan(gentlemen's agreement) and in some other countries it's 320HP. If I remember correctly, the 89-92 twin-turbo ran mid 13's and the 93-98 ran mid to high 12's. I got to find some links.

- Dawly