Verdict is in, I should be in 700hp territory.
With the stock diff!
Quote:
|
It's not that simple. Power increases due to boost are not linear. There are many other factors in play.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That is a rough rule of thumb that losses it's accuracy as you increase boost. The fact is due to heat of compression, the higher the boost the more heat is generated and the increase in the mass flowrate of the air gets smaller. Just because the pressure gage reads 1 bar doesn't mean that you are getting double the mass flow rate.
|
I put my money at 550whp!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ben, you need to go for a ride in the Chevelle on the bottle with the slicks on. |
Quote:
Quote:
I'd put my money on the Chevelle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Adam, you need to come out with us so we can see what your car will put down.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Btw, don't forget guys that I am being conservative here. I'm NOT adding any hp to that estimate from the bigger lift, more duration, port matched intake, a 12:1 AFR over the old 15:1 AFR, or the fact that this time I have sealed head gaskets and intake manifold gaskets! Thanks for the compliment Ben. :beer: Yours is the fastest cleanest C3 I've ever been in. And it has flippin AC!!! |
Quote:
It's not like I'm going to allow some shop to attempt to tune my car. It's mine! Stay away. So hp wise, a dyno run is worth nothing to me. |
Btw, SSCobra, your experience alone would yield a better ET. I'm not trying to mess with your turf here, because when it comes to drag experience, I have none.
Further, the Chevelle is a purpose drag car isn't it? I think the Cobra would be a better comparison to Cambria. I've never put anything higher than 91 in Cambria, and I never will. Not my intent with the car. Her job is to be able to punish a C6 on the freeway from a roll and look good as I drive the gf around on the weekends. |
Quote:
:lmfao: |
:gatlin:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Put slicks on it. I'd still bet on Ron's Chevelle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, the Chevelle only put down 530rwhp on a 150 shot so if your at where you think you are you should be 100rwhp more than me and you have a lighter car. As for the dyno test, I don't have AFR gauge so I wanted to run it on the dyno to see where it's at and also to get the timing dialed in. I spent about 2 hours tuning it on Friday and it's running really good so I probably will not run it on the dyno and just see what it does at the track. I think you need to take Ben up on the offer to barrow his ET Streets because I think you and I need to run on the 31st. I'll even run you on just motor for the first run. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:pot_stir: |
Quote:
Adam I hope you come out to the drags just for shits and giggles, but at this time it's not a serious objective comparison of anything. |
Quote:
You have a gutted, caged, big block chevelle on nitrous and slicks that's not "really built" for drag racing?????? I understand what you are saying about the axles and rear end, but you don't need the super strong billet stuff when you take ALL the weight out of the car. How long have you been racing this car? Any form of racing other than drag racing? Oh wait the 3.73s for for better gas mileage and the removed hood was for better cooling in that LA stop and go traffic. You will crush Adam and anyone else on motorgen. Want to be fair race him in the Mustang like you did me. |
You guys smell that? That is the smell of testosterone and octane!!
|
Quote:
Also, the Chevelle is a stock big block car. It's not like I added a big block to a small block car so I could go drag race it. You also mention not having a hood. The reason it doesn't have a hood is because I had a fiberglass one and it was cracked. When I started to restore the car I trashed the damaged hood because I was going to buy a new one. I haven't had the money to buy a new one so I drive it without one. And since you mentioned it, as a matter of fact it did run cooler without the hood on in traffic. However, it was quicker in the quarter with it on. My point was that the suspension is not built for drag racing. It's just stock. I installed the 3.73's back around 1995 when the car was my daily driver. If I was going to build it strictly for drag racing the car would be a lot faster. I would install a 4.56 gear with a spool, a 4500 stall, Moroso drag spring front and rear, remove the power steering, install lexan windows and so on. Not to mention that I wouldn't have the little tiny cam I have now. You also brought up the Cobra which is also not built for drag racing but it's gone 11.69 at 119. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the fastest car on Motorgen, though not by a regular user, is Paul Ho's Turbo Civic that runs 9s at over 150. That's a purpose built car. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
First of all, calm down guys. I was excited that guys on speedtalk and Vettemod told me that I should be in 700hp territory. That's all. Second of all, I said several times that I think I would lose to CobraSS for several reasons, but what do I care? I'll race him. What am I going to cry if I run a 12 sec 1/4 mile for the first time in my life with a motor that I built that runs on 91 octane and I lose to a guy with experience who runs 10s on nitrous? Prooob not. Sure I'll race him. But only if we both fill up with 91 at the same gas station before we head into the strip and only if we both run street tires. But please do use your nitrous, if it was built for nitrous, use the nitrous. In fact you should use it in 1st gear so you understand my traction pain. That's cute that someone can run 9 seconds in a Civic, but unless it's on 91 octane with street tires I really don't care. Not a fair comparison. If you guys think I'm closer to 550whp... ok... cool! Should I cry about that? I get a 550whp conservative estimate? That's still over 650hp. Oh please, someone hand me a tissue box. Finally, Ben, suck my balls. I prob have a shorter shift throw than anyone on this forum. I have a pro 5.0 with a custom 2" stick. I was shifting slow so I didn't lose traction and slide us into a wall. Like I told you, even 2nd to 3rd will break it loose. |
Let me set out my calendar right now so no one calls me a coward if I can't show.
I have midterms and won't be back in oc till after the 18th. Then I'll be in SD Halloween weekend for a party. After that I should be free for a while till finals. Also, must go during the day. Well established that I am poor. Must be sub $40. No $100 private track nights. On that note, I think the most logical thing to do would be to just put Cambria on the dyno during Sean's scheduled cheap dyno day. Takes my shitty tires/ driving out of the equation. |
I think it's really funny that Sean was teasing me just a few years ago about having only 185hp. And that we all thought his 315hp Camaro was a rocket.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ben, I don't agree that the vette and the Chevelle are on the same level of tune. My vette has a ton of room for improvement. Areo package, weight reduction, metal bushings, cage, big brakes, etc...... Adam, I think you would lose even if you were driving the chevelle and Ron was driving the chambrio. He treed me by .5 secs in the stang and cut and awesome 60ft (on ET streets). I wasn't able to run him down even though there I had 4 mph on him. |
Quote:
But you had 4mph on him? How much hp are you making? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.