![]() |
What's your favorite truck?
My vote.
2nd gen Ford Ranger, 2WD, MODIFIED. ![]() |
Blue Ford Raptor with a heads and cam BOSS 6.2L.
![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
More info: http://www.therangerstation.com/reso...gerHistory.htm |
I was gonna say something predictable like a Cyclone. But then I remembered the truck I just about literally grew up in. It was my dad's work truck.
Jeep J20 ![]() Later when I was about 16 I got it for a while. It was affectionately known as "The Antichrist" for it's, mmm, temperamental behavior. |
Camburg's Edge was far more bad ass [but maybe im just bias]
![]() |
![]() |
Quote:
|
Leedom and SoCal55, you guys are both stupid.
I don't care if a 97 is considered a different model, and I don't care if an Edge is a different model. They only changed the front grill and sidemarkers! I won't grant them a 3rd gen until they actually change the body style! They put a different bumper on the Edge and a cowl in the hood and I'm supposed to consider it a different model? No. I just called a 99 Viper a 1st gen in the other thread, are you going to cry about that too because they added a hatchback window since the original? Going by this logic Corvettes would be on the 12th generation. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
6th gen Corvette (1975) ![]() 7th gen Corvette (1978) ![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
![]() 82 Corvette, removable urethane bumpers, very different styles. Makes the car about a foot longer. 205hp 350ci EFI best available, 4 speed automatic overdrive only. No side pipes available. Different front clip, different rear clip, different hood, different doors with aluminum crash hardware. Glass rear window, no convertibles available. Different seats and interior completely. Iron diff changed to aluminum diff and crossmember. And I don't think 82s came with rallye wheels. 3rd generation. ![]() |
Also the frame was stronger in 78 on, and the fiberglass tunnel was replaced with a steel tunnel.
Different body, different frame, different drivetrain. But since the body had the same lines around the fenders, GM considered it the same generation. Don't even get me started on the 20th generation Evo. :leaving: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You could drop any C3 body on any C3 frame, without the frame extensions and crash harware of the later C3s, but yes, frames were different. I'm sure Glenn or Bird could explain this better than I can. |
|
Those Tundras got BIG.
Ben, GKULL is actually the frame expert as I remember on CF if you really want some info. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Syclone.
|
Quote:
Based on your logic, does Sean and my gen mustang get lumped into the 93-98 since all they really did was sharpen some lines. Other than that they look pretty similar. same profile. 99-04 ![]() 94-98 ![]() |
What I used to own. 1976 Ford F150 4X4 with the short wide bed. 428SCJ instead of the 360 (last year for FE block trucks) with 4 speed manual, two speed transfer case. Twin shocks in the front. Torsen equipped Dana 44 and Detroit locker equipped 9" rear. I never got stuck in that truck. It would go everywhere.
Bob |
Quote:
But yes, I'm glad you acknowledge that you and Sean have the same gen Mustang. Even though Sean has a different hood, different front bumper, (a complete front end change, more than they did to the Ranger) a different rear bumper and a different drivetrain. Oh yeah, and a different rear suspension setup. And probably a bunch of other stuff that I don't know about. Yes I know about the I beams, and actually, unless you own your own fab shop and can move the motor back, move the frame in, so that you can move the a-arms in far enough and make them long enough for decent travel, I beams are the way to go. Which would be... 2nd gen right? :rolleyes: ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
An A-arm suspension is superior to the I-beam in terms of handling. However, you are limited to just how much travel (14-15 inches) you can get with the stock mounting locations without overly widening the front end. Now on the I-beam suspension you can get much more with the stock I-beam mounting locations but you do have to move the radius arm mounting locations back and use extended radius arms. But you can get 20+ inches of travel fairly easy. In terms of cost the I-beam suspension wins hands down. If I were to choose a truck to build as a prerunner it would definately be a pre '76 F150 with the I-beams.
|
Leedom, I don't believe you really think the 97s and earlier look different enough from the 98s and newer. I think you were just making a distinction induced by your knowledge and now you feel the need to stand by it.
A-arms, better geometry, yeah. You know it's not an I-beam truck when it doesn't have 10 degrees of negative camber after backing up. I-beams, better for the guy who can't fab who wants a strong setup without breaking the bank, if you want real travel. ...Now I want a Ranger. Damn. |
Quote:
|
![]() I already own mine. I like the 1968 to 1979 FJ40 Land Cruiser. I also like the 1972 to 1992 full size blazer/jimmy. ![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:bigthumbsup:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.