Wow what? Can you enlighten me? not gonna bring this up in court but i'm really curious!

http://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD-Loca...guidelines.pdf





Assembly Bill (AB) 1806 (Chapter 69, Statutes of 2006) a Budget trailer bill, was enacted on
July 12, 2006, and as an urgency bill was effective on that day. Among other unrelated budget
implementation issues, AB 1806 added Government Code (GC) section 76104.7 which
provides for a $1 penalty for every $10 or fraction thereof upon every fine, penalty, and
forfeiture levied on criminal offenses including traffic offenses, but excluding parking offenses.
AB 1806 also changed the distribution on sex offender fines pursuant to Penal Code (PC)
section 290.3.

Boostn, for there to be an exception to the law, in this case penalty assessment, it must be stated in the law. They're actually talking about this in my class right now. In the statute that I violated, it clearly stated, fine not to exceed $250. The fine is everything that I am forced to pay as a result of the infraction, is it not? There were no exceptions in the statute.

Therefore paying over $600 as a result of the penalty assessment, was in clear violation of the statute and not within an exception. As none was stated. Illegal. :judge:

Civil assessments are separate fines with separate reasoning, penalty bullshit assessments are not.



Ben, Dover NH. Haha, seriously. Ben Dover. Bend Over. :jester:

I see you've been mixing resin without your mask again . . .

Yes actually, last night. Fixing broken headliner pieces in my living room.

Why would you wear a mask when working with resin? That's like pouring Tequila down the drain.

I don't know, something about normal brain function I've grown attached to over the years.

Weren't you the original drunk poster?

Nope. That title belongs to BADASSC6, a.k.a., "Arggh I'm a Pirate."

Lol