Quote:
|
You are correct. I found the link. The stock MKIV supras ran 13.3(export model) and 13.8 japanland model.
http://www.mkiv.co.nz/specs.htm edit - weird how the japland model had less HP and more TQ though. |
Quote:
Now though, at least on the GT-R they integrate GPS into the ECM. There's a top speed governor (like 100 or so) when outside of race tracks. Drive onto a racetrack and poof, limiter automatically removed. |
Quote:
The USDM Mk4 supra (320hp) ran a mid 13. No stock Mk4 supra could break into the 12's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The nice thing about supras was that they picked up power soo quick. The MkIII where blah. The MkIV were different. They has fuel maps already in the stock ECUs that covered serious boost levels. The 2Jz actually shared most of it's archetecture with toyota's indy car motor.
I personally saw a 2jz put down 430 rwhp with intake, exhast, lockwire on the wastegate, and a boost controller. NO TUNNING. Later that same car had the RPS single turbo kit and was rocking 850 rwhp. |
motorweek video w/ early-mid 90's japanese cars
Sorry, didn't read the whole thread but I did find this video. Old motorweek episode. Has the 300zx turbo, 3000gt vr-4, mkIV supra, and 3rd gen rx-7, my personal fav :) See 3:25 for the supra section.
$49k (1990's dollars!) 320 hp/315 lb-ft Toyota spec? 5.8 sec 0-60 mph 14.1 @ 105 mph 1/4 mile (we all know that depends heavily on many factors) I've always like the Supras though, they are mean as hell and it doesn't take much to make a lot of reliable power. |
it is a heavy car...thats the only reason why it ran those time...still one hell of a bad ass car in my opinion
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.