Working out kinks at new provider

[Vettezuki]

Well, this we're now live on our new provider. Hopefully you don't notice too much of a hit in performance. We'll be working out a couple small kinks and mirroring some data, but otherwise, it should all be transparent to you. . . :ugh:

[Chuck]

Sloooooooowwwwwww!!!

[Shaolin Crane]

dont like the faggot "like" system
Also need more PM's please

[Vettezuki]

The faggot like system could look a little nicer, but is necessary. Every time someone clicks on like and hits their SN profile, it's instantly dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of impressions. We'd be idiots not to have it . . should have had it a while back.

Chuck,

It's not so much that it's slow, but that what we had was fast. It was a dedicated box on its own line in a data center on the backbone in LA. From work (where we have a fast connection) I could get 9MB (that's Mega Bytes, not bits) per second. That's disc access speed. Now, we're on a shared server, which if the other sites on the server get slammed at the same time, available peak bandwidth just isn't there. Sorry, but it's literally 1/10th the cost.

[Shaolin Crane]

Im just giving my opinion, also would like more pm's plz

[Vettezuki]

Im just giving my opinion, also would like more pm's plz

I know. I'm just splain'n.

How many PMs would be a useful number? How bout 250? Chuck still gets 51.

[Shaolin Crane]

250 would be perfect

[Chuck]

:cheese:
Yes I do and I want more than Guy.

No but seriously 250 would be good or just 51 if you can't part with the megabyte it would take up.

[Chuck]

Also you need a donation feature to keep costs down maybe get going on the project car.

But I like it slower because I can maybe keep up now.

[Shaolin Crane]

Thats a good one :thumbs_up:

[AARP]

Runs just fine for me. Fast as before as far as my cable can tell.

[Vettezuki]

Well, my little problem with video processing was because shared hosts don't provide ffmpeg, which is required for any site processing video, so we're gonna have to level up.